Abstract

Synaptic transmission is controlled by re-uptake systems that reduce transmitter concentrations in the synaptic cleft and recycle the transmitter into presynaptic terminals. The re-uptake systems are thought to ensure cytosolic concentrations in the terminals that are sufficient for reloading empty synaptic vesicles (SVs). Genetic deletion of glycine transporter 2 (GlyT2) results in severely disrupted inhibitory neurotransmission and ultimately to death. Here we investigated the role of GlyT2 at inhibitory glycinergic synapses in the mammalian auditory brainstem. These synapses are tuned for resilience, reliability, and precision, even during sustained high-frequency stimulation when endocytosis and refilling of SVs probably contribute substantially to efficient replenishment of the readily releasable pool (RRP). Such robust synapses are formed between MNTB and LSO neurons (medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, lateral superior olive). By means of patch-clamp recordings, we assessed the synaptic performance in controls, in GlyT2 knockout mice (KOs), and upon acute pharmacological GlyT2 blockade. Via computational modeling, we calculated the reoccupation rate of empty release sites and RRP replenishment kinetics during 60-s challenge and 60-s recovery periods. Control MNTB-LSO inputs maintained high fidelity neurotransmission at 50 Hz for 60 s and recovered very efficiently from synaptic depression. During 'marathon-experiments' (30,600 stimuli in 20 min), RRP replenishment accumulated to 1,260-fold. In contrast, KO inputs featured severe impairments. For example, the input number was reduced to ~1 (vs. ~4 in controls), implying massive functional degeneration of the MNTB-LSO microcircuit and a role of GlyT2 during synapse maturation. Surprisingly, neurotransmission did not collapse completely in KOs as inputs still replenished their small RRP 80-fold upon 50 Hz | 60 s challenge. However, they totally failed to do so for extended periods. Upon acute pharmacological GlyT2 inactivation, synaptic performance remained robust, in stark contrast to KOs. RRP replenishment was 865-fold in marathon-experiments, only ~1/3 lower than in controls. Collectively, our empirical and modeling results demonstrate that GlyT2 re-uptake activity is not the dominant factor in the SV recycling pathway that imparts indefatigability to MNTB-LSO synapses. We postulate that additional glycine sources, possibly the antiporter Asc-1, contribute to RRP replenishment at these high-fidelity brainstem synapses.

Highlights

  • Inhibitory glycinergic neurotransmission is prominent in the mammalian brainstem, spinal cord, and some other regions

  • Using a monoclonal primary antibody, we here confirm the labeling pattern in the superior olivary complex of mice (Figure 1Aa). Immunohistochemical labeling with this antibody in glycine transporter 2 (GlyT2) GlyT2 knockout (KO) mice revealed a complete absence of GlyT2 signals from the lateral superior olive (LSO), the adjacent superior paraolivary nucleus (SPN), and the surrounding reticular formation (Figures 1Ba,b)

  • The labeling pattern of vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter (VIAAT) appeared unchanged in GlyT2 KOs (Figures 1Bb,c), indicating that synaptic vesicle (SV) loading with glycine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) does not become abolished upon GlyT2 gene deletion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inhibitory glycinergic neurotransmission is prominent in the mammalian brainstem, spinal cord, and some other regions It plays a role in motor rhythm generation and sensory processing, for example in the pain pathway, the retina, and auditory nuclei involved in sound localization (Becker, 1990; Wässle et al, 1998; Zeilhofer et al, 2012; Vandenberg et al, 2014; Friauf et al, 2019). Glycinergic neurons release their transmitter molecules from presynaptic axon terminals through fast exocytosis of synaptic vesicles (SVs). GlyT1 is associated with glial cells and coupled to the cotransport of 2 Na+ ions and 1 Cl− ion (Roux and Supplisson, 2000), reducing the extracellular glycine concentration

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call