Abstract

This study investigated the acute glucose response to low-intensity, moderate-intensity, and high-intensity interval exercise compared to no-exercise in healthy insufficiently active males using a four-arm, randomized, crossover design. Ten males (age: 37.3±7.3years, BMI: 29.3±6.5kg·m-2 ) completed four 30-minute interventions at weekly intervals comprising low-intensity exercise (LIE) at ~35% V˙O2 R, moderate-intensity exercise (MIE) at ~50% V˙O2 R, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) at ~80% V˙O2 R, and a no-exercise control. Participants performed cycle ergometer exercise 30minutes after finishing breakfast. Glucose response was assessed using a continuous glucose monitor under free-living conditions with dietary intake replicated. A significant effect for intensity on energy expenditure was identified (P<.001) with similar energy cost in MIE (mean±SD: 869±148kJ) and HIIE (806±145 kJ), which were both greater than LIE (633±129kJ). The pattern of glucose response between the interventions over time was different (P=.02). Glucose was lower 25minutes into each of the HIIE, MIE and LIE trials respectively (mean difference±SD: -0.7±1.1; -0.9±1.1; -0.6±0.9mmol·L-1 ; P<.05) than in the no-exercise trial. Glucose response was not different between exercise intensities (P>.05). Twenty-four-hour AUC was not affected by exercise intensity (P=.75). There was a significant effect for exercise enjoyment (P=.02), with LIE (69±4) preferred less than HIIE (mean±SD: 84±14; P=.02), MIE (73±5; P=.03), and no-exercise (75±4; P=.03). Exercise at any intensity 30minutes after a meal affects glycemic regulation equally in insufficiently active males. Moderate to vigorous exercise intensities were preferred, and therefore, the exercise guidelines appear appropriate for the prevention of cardiometabolic disease.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call