Abstract
The commentary concerns the recent ruling of the Supreme Court on the possibility of recognizing a judgment passed after a hearing to be promulgated based on Article 100 § 1a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In its decision the Supreme Court ruled that a judgment passed after a hearing does not constitute a judgment unless it has been promulgated under the applicable provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (sententia non existens) since a verbal promulgation is the constitutional element of issuing a judgment. At the same time, however, the Supreme Court allowed judgments passed in open court, under Article 100 § 1a of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to be considered promulgated. According to the view taken in this commentary, the position of the Supreme Court is correct, however, it prompts further amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
