Abstract

AbstractAimInsight into global biome responses to climatic and other environmental changes is essential to address key questions about past and future impacts of such changes. By simulating global biome patterns 140 ka to present, we aimed to address important questions about biome changes during this interval.LocationGlobal.TaxonSpermatophyta.MethodsUsing the LPJ‐GUESS dynamic global vegetation model, we made 89 simulations driven using ice‐core atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Earth's obliquity, and outputs from a pre‐industrial and 88 palaeoclimate experiments run using HadCM3. Experiments were run for 81 time slices between 1 and 140 ka, seven ‘hosing’ experiments also being run, using a 1‐Sv freshwater flux to the North Atlantic, for time slices corresponding to Heinrich Events H0–H6. Using a rule‐based approach, based on carbon mass and leaf area index of the LPJ‐GUESS plant functional types, the biome was inferred for each grid cell. Biomes were mapped, and the extent and total vegetation biomass of each biome, and total global vegetation biomass, estimated.ResultsSubstantial changes in biome extents and locations were found on all vegetated continents. Although the largest magnitude changes were in Eurasia, important changes were seen in tropical latitudes and the Southern Hemisphere. Total global extent of most biomes varied on multi‐millennial (orbital) time scales, although some (e.g. Tropical Raingreen Forest) responded principally to the c. 100‐kyr glacial–interglacial cycle and others (e.g. Temperate Broad‐leaved Evergreen Forest) mainly to the c. 20‐kyr precession cycle. Many also responded to millennial contrasts between stadial (‘hosing’) and interstadial climates, with some (e.g. Tropical Evergreen Forest) showing stronger responses than to the multi‐millennial changes.Main conclusionsNo two time slices had identical biome patterns. Even equivalent Holocene and last interglacial time slices, and the last and penultimate glacial maxima, showed important differences. Only a small proportion of global land area experienced no biome change since 140 ka; many places experienced multiple biome changes. These modelling experiments provided little evidence for long‐term biome stability.

Highlights

  • A recent study of almost 600 palaeovegetation records concluded that climatic changes since the last glacial maximum (LGM) drove moderate-to-large changes in both the composition and structure of vegetation at most locations across the globe (Nolan et al, 2018)

  • The objective of this study was to address a number of important questions relating to the global impacts upon vegetation of both the climatic changes of various magnitudes and the changes in [CO2]atm that have taken place during the past 140 kyr, a period extending from the penultimate glacial maximum (PGM) through the last interglacial (LIG), the last glacial stage and the Holocene, to the present

  • TrRG, TeSF, TeMxF, BPk and BENF are most extensive during the Holocene and LIG, but show limited changes in global extent for Heinrich Event simulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recent study of almost 600 palaeovegetation records concluded that climatic changes since the last glacial maximum (LGM) drove moderate-to-large changes in both the composition and structure of vegetation at most locations across the globe (Nolan et al, 2018). Vegetation modelling studies have reached similar conclusions, albeit they emphasize the role of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]atm) since the LGM in driving observed vegetation changes (Prentice, Harrison, & Bartlein, 2011). Such studies contrasting the LGM and recent past provide valuable insights into global vegetation changes across the past 21 kyr, both global climate and [CO2]atm have fluctuated substantially, on time scales of 104–105 years, throughout at least the past 800 kyr (EPICA community members, 2004; Jouzel et al, 2007; Luthi et al, 2008), whilst climate has exhibited strong centennial to millennial fluctuations (Rasmussen et al, 2014).

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.