Abstract
There is no other example in human teratology where, after more than 40 epidemiological studies, repeated meta-analyses and thousands of pregnancies, the fetal safety or risk of an agent has not been verified and settled.The objectives of the present review were to identify and discuss sources of bias that may lead clinicians and scientists to believe that SRIs cause malformation or other adverse outcomes, where, in fact, they may not.The present study highlights sources of bias that may explain why children exposed in utero to SRI exhibit higher rates of congenital malformations, mostly cardiovascular and other complications. It appears that pregnant women treated for depression and anxiety are distinctively different from healthy women in numerous covariates, which may confound pregnancy outcomes. Acknowledging and adjusting for these sources of bias are critical before one selects to withhold therapy for moderate or severe cases of depression and anxiety in pregnancy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
