Abstract

Georg Simmel’s political position has rarely been discussed explicitly – perhaps because many scholars have assumed that Simmel was ‘apolitical’ before 1914. The present article shows that even before 1914 Simmel held a distinct political position, to wit a peculiar kind of liberal-Nietzschean aristocratic individualism. This individualism is the result of a passage through ‘the hard school’ of egalitarian socialism in order to reach true individuality. It is closely related to Simmel’s central theorem of the so-called ‘individual law’. After a socio-historical contextualisation of Simmel’s political thought, the article follows this motif in detail through his diagnosis of the times, his theory of socio-cultural development, his engagement in cultural politics, his ideal of personality formation and his engagement in the bourgeois women’s movement. Simmel’s thought culminates in a conception of ‘dialectic aristocratism’. In this respect, the normative core of Simmel’s political standpoint is very close to Max Weber’s position. The last section argues that Simmel’s war writings do not mark a break in his political thinking, but rather apply the same theorem of the ‘individual law’ to the German state. Through its various stages, the article shows that Simmel’s political orientation, linked to key theoretical concepts, is deeply rooted in the educated bourgeoisie’s worldview and habitus.

Highlights

  • Georg Simmel’s political position has rarely been discussed explicitly – perhaps because many scholars have assumed that Simmel was ‘apolitical’ before 1914

  • The educated bourgeoisie was a minority in relation to the population as a whole (Ullrich, 2014: 279; Wehler, 1995: 732), their ideas of lifestyle, education, personality and ‘legitimate culture’ (Bourdieu) determined most of the cultural and scientific discourse in Wilhelmine society

  • He was not able to reflexively detach himself from his educated bourgeois normative ideal of the ‘individual law’. This was evident from 1900 onwards in his writings on cultural philosophy and sociology, as well as in his political thought. Despite differences in their approaches to, for example, the concept of the nation, political ideas and analyses, Simmel and Weber – the latter of which combined in his habitus and even in his theory (Rehberg, 1979) the economic bourgeoisie, political bourgeoisie, service bourgeoisie and educated bourgeoisie – shared the basic ideal of ‘ethical personalism’ (Hennis, 1987: 173), the ‘individual law’ and the political ideal of liberal Nietzschean ‘aristocratic individualism’ (Mommsen, 1971/2015: 42)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Georg Simmel’s political position has rarely been discussed explicitly – perhaps because many scholars have assumed that Simmel was ‘apolitical’ before 1914.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.