Abstract
Curved space-time 4-interval of any probe particle does not contradict to flat non-empty 3-space which, in turn, assumes the global material overlap of elementary continuous particles or the nonlocal Universe with universal Euclidean geometry. Relativistic particle’s time is the chain function of particles speed and this time differs from the proper time of a motionless local observer. Equal passive and active relativistic energy-charges are employed to match the universal free fall and the Principle of Equivalence in non-empty (material) space, where continuous radial densities of elementary energy-charges obey local superpositions and mutual penetrations. The known planetary perihelion precession, the radar echo delay, and the gravitational light bending can be explained quantitatively by the singularity-free metric without departure from Euclidean spatial geometry. The flatspace precession of non-point orbiting gyroscopes is non-New- tonian one due to the Einstein dilation of local time within the Earth’s radial energy-charge rather than due to unphysical warping of Euclidean space.
Highlights
The ideal penetration of a static superfluid medium through a rotating drag one was observed in He3-He4 experiments well before the distributed Cooper pair explained the nonlocal nature of superconductivity
Does spatial distribution of paired superelectrons mean that two nonlocal carriers move one through another as overlapping continuous distributions of mass-densities or do these densities bypass each other separately without mutual penetrations? Is there a principle difference between the superfluid motion of two paired electrons and the free, geodesic motion of any normal electron between drag collisions with energy exchanges?
There are a lot of disputes in modern gravitation and astroparticle physics
Summary
The ideal penetration of a static superfluid medium through a rotating drag one was observed in He3-He4 experiments well before the distributed Cooper pair explained the nonlocal nature of superconductivity. In October 1915, Einstein’s field equation [5,6] and the Hilbert variational approach to independent field and particle densities [7] were proposed in Berlin and Gottingen, respectively, for geometrization of gravitational fields “generated” by the energy-momentum density of Mies continuous matter [8], which later failed to replace point masses of the pre-quantum Universe. This metric theory of gravitational fields around still localized particles, known today as General Relativity, can operate fluently with curved spatial displacement dlN =. GR solutions for dynamics of the considered probe particle N are related to its space-time interval, dsN2
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call