Abstract
Geometrical scaling (GS) of the inelastic overlap function and GS of the imaginary part of the elastic nonflip amplitude are discussed and their consequences are compared. Since the corresponding real part does not scale both types of GS are not equivalent. It is shown that the energy dependences of the slope parameters and of the total cross sections for pp, p̄p, πp and Kp scattering are compatible with GS of the overlap functions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
