Abstract

Geometrical inequalities show how certain parameters of a physical system set restrictions on other parameters. For instance, a black hole of given mass can not rotate too fast, or an ordinary object of given size can not have too much electric charge. In this article, we are interested in bounds on the angular momentum and electromagnetic charges, in terms of total mass and size. We are mainly concerned with inequalities for black holes and ordinary objects. The former are the most studied systems in this context in General Relativity, and where most results have been found. Ordinary objects, on the other hand, present numerous challenges and many basic questions concerning geometrical estimates for them are still unanswered. We present the many results in these areas. We make emphasis in identifying the mathematical conditions that lead to such estimates, both for black holes and ordinary objects.

Highlights

  • It is interesting that in Theorem 1 a rigidity statement is obtained even in the non-electrovacuum case. It is not known whether an analogous rigidity result holds for axially symmetric matter fields with non-trivial angular momentum in which the equality in (146) is achieved

  • Cabrera-Munguia et al (2010) work on the Tomimatsu and Dietz–Hoenselaers solution describing two Kerr black holes, one of which has negative mass. They find that there is a rank in the parameters of the individual black holes such that the total mass is smaller than the total angular momentum, that is M2

  • The only extra assumptions we make in this result is that the functions α and f, fk entering the stability criteria for minimal surfaces and marginally outer trapped surfaces (MOTSs) respectively must be axially symmetric

Read more

Summary

Page 2 of 74

The other is the maximum charge and/or angular momentum a black hole can have, beyond which it becomes a naked singularity This problem arose after Reissner (1916) and Nordström (1918) found the solution describing a static, spherically symmetric, electrically charged object. These thresholds in physical parameters values can be identified as limit cases of appropriate geometrical inequalities. We address systems containing ordinary material objects and/or black holes The latter, and the frontier between black holes and naked singularities, is the original and main motivation for the geometrical inequalities presented here.

Page 4 of 74
Motivation from stationary black holes
Page 6 of 74
Page 8 of 74
Heuristic arguments in dynamical black-hole regimes
Page 10 of 74
Page 12 of 74
Motivation from Newtonian objects
Page 14 of 74
Basic definitions
Page 16 of 74
Asymptotically flat and cylindrical ends
Black holes
Page 18 of 74
Isoperimetric surfaces and ordinary objects
Local physical quantities
Global physical quantities
Page 22 of 74
Quasilocal physical quantities
Conserved quantities
Page 24 of 74
Electromagnetic charge
Page 26 of 74
Angular momentum
Page 28 of 74
Page 30 of 74
Global inequalities for black holes
Mass–charge
Results
Discussion
Mass–angular momentum–charge
Page 36 of 74
Multiple black holes
Page 38 of 74
Non-asymptotically flat manifolds
The mass functional M
Page 40 of 74
Page 42 of 74
12 J 2 M2
Quasilocal inequalities for black holes
Area–charge
Page 44 of 74
Area–angular momentum–charge
Page 46 of 74
Page 48 of 74
Area products
Shape of black holes
Page 52 of 74
Relation between M and M
Cosmological constant
Page 54 of 74
An application: non-existence of two black holes in equilibrium
Inequalities for objects
Page 58 of 74
Inequalities for objects without angular momentum
Page 60 of 74
Inequalities for objects with angular momentum
Page 62 of 74
Isoperimetric surfaces
Open problems
Page 66 of 74
Page 68 of 74
Page 70 of 74
Page 72 of 74
Page 74 of 74
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call