Abstract

As previous studies have shown, geomagnetic activity during the solar minimum following solar cycle 23 was at low levels unprecedented during the space era, and even since the beginning of the Kp index in 1932. Here, we summarize the characteristics of geomagnetic activity during the first 4 years of cycle 24 following smoothed sunspot minimum in December, 2008, and compare these with those of similar periods during earlier cycles going back to the start of Kp (cycles 17–23). The most outstanding feature is the continuing low levels of geomagnetic activity that are well below those observed during the rising phases of the other cycles studied. Even 4 years into cycle 24, geomagnetic storm rates are still only comparable to or below the rates observed during activity minima in previous cycles. We note that the storm rate during the rising phases of cycles 17–23 was correlated with the peak sunspot number (SSN) in the cycle. Extrapolating these results to the low storm rates in cycle 24 suggests values of the peak SSN in cycle 24 that are consistent with the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center prediction of 90 ± 10, indicating that cycle 24 is likely to be the weakest cycle since at least 1932. No severe (Dst < −200 nT) storms have been observed during the first 4 years of cycle 24 compared with 4 in the comparable interval of cycle 23, and only 10 intense (Dst < −100 nT) storms, compared with 21 in cycle 23. These storms were all associated with the passage of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (ICMEs) and/or their associated sheaths. The lack of strong southward magnetic fields in ICMEs and their sheaths, their lower speeds close to the average solar wind speed, a ~20% reduction in the number of ICMEs passing the Earth, and weaker than normal fields in corotating high-speed streams, contribute to the low levels of geomagnetic storm activity in the rise phase of cycle 24. However, the observation of an ICME with strong southward fields at the STEREO A spacecraft on July 24, 2012, which would have been highly geoeffective had it encountered the Earth, demonstrates that strong geomagnetic storms may still occur during weak solar cycles.

Highlights

  • As is well established, geomagnetic activity, as measured by indices such as Kp (Menvielle & Berthelier 1991) and Dst (Sugiura 1964), is principally driven by the plasma and magnetic field conditions in the solar wind that encounters the Earth (e.g., Hirshberg & Colburn 1969; Arnoldy 1971; Tsurutani &Gonzalez 1997; O’Brien & McPherron 2000; Ji et al 2010; and references therein)

  • The first contributor to the lower geomagnetic activity levels in the rise phase of cycle 24 may be the 20% fewer Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (ICMEs) (86 vs. 106) observed at Earth compared to cycle 23, at least based on the catalog used in this study. (A few events are not plotted in Fig. 9 because Dst remained positive, or Ey is not available.) As is typical

  • – The rate of storm days during the rise phase of each cycle is approximately correlated with the peak sunspot number (SSN) in the cycle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geomagnetic activity, as measured by indices such as Kp (Menvielle & Berthelier 1991) and Dst (Sugiura 1964), is principally driven by the plasma and magnetic field conditions in the solar wind that encounters the Earth Several studies (e.g., Russell et al 2010; Tsurutani et al 2011; Richardson & Cane 2012a, 2012b) have noted that geomagnetic activity during the minimum following solar cycle 23 was exceptionally low, and associated with unusual solar wind conditions, in particular low magnetic field intensities unprecedented during the space era, and slow flow speeds. We point out that geomagnetic activity continued to be at exceptionally low levels during the rise phase of cycle 24 compared to similar intervals in cycles 17 (the first full cycle for which the Kp index is available) to 23, and discuss the contributing factors

Geomagnetic activity during the first 4 years of cycles 17–24
Relationship between storm rate and cycle peak
Cumulative
Why was intense storm activity so low during the rise of cycle 24?
Geoeffectiveness of corotating streams
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call