Abstract

Simple SummaryFilariasis is emerging as a public health concern for humans, dogs, cats, and other wildlife species, and is frequently found in southeast Asian countries. The present study confirmed the species of filarial nematodes in free-roaming dogs from temple communities. Two species were found: Dirofilaria immitis infection and, for the first time, Brugia pahangi. The occurrence of the two species was comparable. Geographic spatial distribution revealed the abundance of D. immitis and B. pahangi in the central areas at altitudes less than 400 m. However, at higher altitudes between 400 and 800 m, we found a significantly higher number of B. pahangi infections than D. immitis infections. In conclusion, D. immitis and B. pahangi were the most common filarial infections found in community dogs in Northern Thailand. Dogs might be an important reservoir for B. pahangi in that region. The population dynamics of the mosquito vector of B. pahangi across altitudinal gradients merits further study.Filariasis is emerging as a public health concern in tropical and subtropical areas. Filariasis is an endemic problem commonly found in southeast Asian countries. Using the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of the ITS1 region with Vsp I, the overall prevalence rates of Dirofilaria immitis (12.2% (41/337); 95% confidence interval: 9.1–16.1%) and Brugia pahangi (8.3% (28/337); 95% confidence interval: 5.8–11.8%) were determined based on 337 free-roaming community dogs from 20 districts in Northern Thailand. Microfilaremia was found in only 6.2% of dogs (21/337). Co-infection with D. immitis and B. pahangi was observed in two dogs. Of the 215 blood samples examined using a Canine Heartworm Ag Kit, only 3.72% (eight dogs) were D. immitis antigen positive. Among these eight, six dogs had occult D. immitis infections. In terms of geographic distribution, we found the abundance of D. immitis and B. pahangi in the central areas at altitudes less than 400 m to be 12.1% and 10.3%, respectively. In contrast, at higher altitudes between 400 and 800 m, a significantly higher number of B. pahangi compared with D. immitis infected individuals were observed at 14.29% and 4.1%, respectively. In conclusion, D. immitis and B. pahangi were the most common filarial infections found in community dogs in Northern Thailand. Dogs might be an important reservoir of B. pahangi in that region. Increasing awareness and concern and including proper deworming programs for community dogs should be endorsed to reduce the transmission risk. Additionally, the population dynamics of the mosquito vector of B. pahangi across altitudinal gradients deserved further investigation.

Highlights

  • Filarial nematode infection is an important vector-borne disease in tropical countries

  • The distributions of D. immitis and B. pahangi infection in the three zones of Chiang Mai province are shown in Table 2, Table S2, and Figure 1B

  • We covered the detection and confirmation of species of canine filarial infection in free-roaming community dogs found in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand, using a combination of diagnostic methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Filarial nematode infection is an important vector-borne disease in tropical countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) roadmap (WHO 2020), the goal of eliminating filariasis is expected to be achieved by 2030. Filarial infections are currently common in companion animals worldwide [1]. In Southeast Asia, lymphatic filariasis caused by Brugia malayi (Brugian or Malayan filariasis), Wuchereria bancrofti (bancroftian filariasis) and Brugia timori is considered a significant human health problem. Filariasis in dogs is caused by various species, e.g., Dirofilaria spp., Acanthocheilonema spp., and Brugia spp. The life cycle of the filarial worm requires a bloodsucking insect such as mosquitoes as a transmission vector, known as an intermediate host. The ingested microfilariae (L1) from the dog develop into the infective stage larvae (L3) in the vector. The worm has a species–specific target organ within the final host [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.