Abstract

ABSTRACT It is impossible to separate Geoff Harcourt’s economics from his moral values, both professed and practiced. His work exemplifies the view within the political economy approach that values are inevitably embedded in theory. This characteristic is in sharp contrast with the central tenet of the mainstream view of economic science that it is technical and thus value-free. In considering the role of values in economics we focus particularly on the distinction between moral values and epistemological values. We explore their nature, role and interactions at a range of levels in political economy and in mainstream economics: ontology (including scientific motivation), epistemology and methodology. It is shown that, while moral values are inevitably embedded in theorising, their scope can be severely constrained if epistemological values are given priority. The paper is intended as a contribution to meaningful and constructive debate about values in theorising, with an overarching argument for philosophical consistency.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.