Abstract

BackgroundModern agriculture uses hyperspectral cameras that provide hundreds of reflectance data at discrete narrow bands in many environments. These bands often cover the whole visible light spectrum and part of the infrared and ultraviolet light spectra. With the bands, vegetation indices are constructed for predicting agronomically important traits such as grain yield and biomass. However, since vegetation indices only use some wavelengths (referred to as bands), we propose using all bands simultaneously as predictor variables for the primary trait grain yield; results of several multi-environment maize (Aguate et al. in Crop Sci 57(5):1–8, 2017) and wheat (Montesinos-López et al. in Plant Methods 13(4):1–23, 2017) breeding trials indicated that using all bands produced better prediction accuracy than vegetation indices. However, until now, these prediction models have not accounted for the effects of genotype × environment (G × E) and band × environment (B × E) interactions incorporating genomic or pedigree information.ResultsIn this study, we propose Bayesian functional regression models that take into account all available bands, genomic or pedigree information, the main effects of lines and environments, as well as G × E and B × E interaction effects. The data set used is comprised of 976 wheat lines evaluated for grain yield in three environments (Drought, Irrigated and Reduced Irrigation). The reflectance data were measured in 250 discrete narrow bands ranging from 392 to 851 nm (nm). The proposed Bayesian functional regression models were implemented using two types of basis: B-splines and Fourier. Results of the proposed Bayesian functional regression models, including all the wavelengths for predicting grain yield, were compared with results from conventional models with and without bands.ConclusionsWe observed that the models with B × E interaction terms were the most accurate models, whereas the functional regression models (with B-splines and Fourier basis) and the conventional models performed similarly in terms of prediction accuracy. However, the functional regression models are more parsimonious and computationally more efficient because the number of beta coefficients to be estimated is 21 (number of basis), rather than estimating the 250 regression coefficients for all bands. In this study adding pedigree or genomic information did not increase prediction accuracy.

Highlights

  • Modern agriculture uses hyperspectral cameras that provide hundreds of reflectance data at discrete narrow bands in many environments

  • In this paper, we propose conventional Bayesian regression models and Bayesian functional regression models for jointly modelling high-throughput plant phenotyping platforms (HTPP) data with pedigree or genomic information that take into account interaction terms (G × E and B × E)

  • In this case, taking into account genomic information did not improve prediction accuracy in comparison to those models that ignore this information, but the proposed method are easy to implement in R under a Bayesian framework

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern agriculture uses hyperspectral cameras that provide hundreds of reflectance data at discrete narrow bands in many environments. Since vegetation indices only use some wavelengths (referred to as bands), we propose using all bands simultaneously as predictor variables for the primary trait grain yield; results of several multi-environment maize (Aguate et al in Crop Sci 57(5):1–8, 2017) and wheat (MontesinosLópez et al in Plant Methods 13(4):1–23, 2017) breeding trials indicated that using all bands produced better pre‐ diction accuracy than vegetation indices. Until now, these prediction models have not accounted for the effects of genotype × environment (G × E) and band × environment (B × E) interactions incorporating genomic or pedigree information. With a population in the hundreds, it is possible to analyze mutant populations, detect QTLs, discover gene × environment associations [6], and increase the prediction accuracy of the primary trait (grain yield) by using pedigree or genomic information [16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call