Genetics in the United States and Great Britain, 1890-1930: a review with speculations.

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessCritiques & ContentionsGenetics in the United States and Great Britain, 1890-1930: A Review with SpeculationsDaniel J. KevlesDaniel J. Kevles Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 71, Number 3Sep., 1980 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/352543 Views: 16Total views on this site Citations: 26Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Robert Erickson The origins of mouse genetics and the discovery of the T-locus, (Jan 2022): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824016-8.00015-5Yafeng Shan Beyond Mendelism and Biometry, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (Oct 2021): 155–163.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.014Dominic J. Berry Historiography of Plant Breeding and Agriculture, (Jan 2021): 499–525.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90119-0_27Dominic J. Berry Historiography of Plant Breeding and Agriculture, (Jun 2019): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_27-1Clare Button James Cossar Ewart and the Origins of the Animal Breeding Research Department in Edinburgh, 1895–1920, Journal of the History of Biology 51, no.33 (Oct 2017): 445–477.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9500-0Nils Roll-Hansen Commentary: Wilhelm Johannsen and the problem of heredity at the turn of the 19th century, International Journal of Epidemiology 43, no.44 (Apr 2014): 1007–1013.https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu066Dominic Berry The plant breeding industry after pure line theory: Lessons from the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (Jun 2014): 25–37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.02.006MELINDA BALDWIN ‘Keeping in the race’: physics, publication speed and national publishing strategies in Nature , 1895–1939, The British Journal for the History of Science 47, no.22 (Jul 2013): 257–279.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000381Daniel J. Kevles Why and How: Reflections in an Autobiographical Key, Science in Context 26, no.44 (Oct 2013): 627–638.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889713000318Berris Charnley Experiments in empire-building: Mendelian genetics as a national, imperial, and global agricultural enterprise, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no.22 (Jun 2013): 292–300.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.11.003Nathan Q. Ha The Riddle of Sex: Biological Theories of Sexual Difference in the Early Twentieth-Century, Journal of the History of Biology 44, no.33 (Nov 2010): 505–546.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9257-1Kyung-Man Kim What would a Bourdieuan sociology of scientific truth look like?, Social Science Information 48, no.11 (Mar 2009): 57–79.https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408099637Erik L. Peterson William Bateson from Balanoglossus to Materials for the Study of Variation: The Transatlantic Roots of Discontinuity and the (un)naturalness of Selection, Journal of the History of Biology 41, no.22 (Aug 2007): 267–305.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-007-9137-5Nadia Abu El-Haj The Genetic Reinscription of Race, Annual Review of Anthropology 36, no.11 (Sep 2007): 283–300.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120522Matthew Orr WHAT IS A SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW, AND HOW DOES IT BEAR ON THE INTERPLAY OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION?, Zygon� 41, no.22 (Jun 2006): 435–444.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00748.xBrian K. Hall Betrayed byBalanoglossus: William Bateson's rejection of evolutionary embryology as the basis for understanding evolution, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B, no.11 (Jan 2005): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21030 Kathy J. Cooke From Science to Practice, or Practice to Science? Chickens and Eggs in Raymond Pearl's Agricultural Breeding Research, 1907-1916, Isis 88, no.11 (Oct 2015): 62–86.https://doi.org/10.1086/383627Irving I. Gottesman, Aksel Bertelsen Legacy of German psychiatric genetics: Hindsight is always 20/20, American Journal of Medical Genetics 67, no.44 (Jul 1996): 317–322.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960726)67:4<317::AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO;2-JMartin Richards Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance, Public Understanding of Science 5, no.33 (Dec 2016): 217–230.https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/003Tateo ARIMOTO Migration of scientific activity center and scientific literatures., Journal of Information Processing and Management 35, no.99 (Jan 1992): 759–764.https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.35.759Jan Sapp The Nine Lives of Gregor Mendel, (Jan 1990): 137–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2057-6_5Nils Roll-Hansen The crucial experiment of Wilhelm Johannsen, Biology & Philosophy 4, no.33 (Jul 1989): 303–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426630Robert Scott Root-Bernstein Mendel and Methodology, History of Science 21, no.33 (Jul 2016): 275–295.https://doi.org/10.1177/007327538302100303 William Schneider Toward the Improvement of the Human Race: The History of Eugenics in France, The Journal of Modern History 54, no.22 (Oct 2015): 268–291.https://doi.org/10.1086/244134 John Neu One Hundred Sixth Critical Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences (to January 1981), Isis 72, no.55 (Oct 2015): 5–248.https://doi.org/10.1086/352904Jacques G. Ruelland Bibliographie, (): 301–318.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.enseditions.1135