Abstract

Cells adjust their metabolism in response to mutations, but how this reprogramming depends on the genetic context is not well known. Specifically, the absence of individual enzymes can affect reprogramming, and thus the impact of mutations in cell growth. Here, we examine this issue with an in silico model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's metabolism. By quantifying the variability in the growth rate of 10000 different mutant metabolisms that accumulated changes in their reaction fluxes, in the presence, or absence, of a specific enzyme, we distinguish a subset of modifier genes serving as buffers or potentiators of variability. We notice that the most potent modifiers refer to the glycolysis pathway and that, more broadly, they show strong pleiotropy and epistasis. Moreover, the evidence that this subset depends on the specific growing condition strengthens its systemic underpinning, a feature only observed before in a toy model of a gene-regulatory network. Some of these enzymes also modulate the effect that biochemical noise and environmental fluctuations produce in growth. Thus, the reorganization of metabolism induced by mutations has not only direct physiological implications but also transforms the influence that other mutations have on growth. This is a general result with implications in the development of cancer therapies based on metabolic inhibitors.

Highlights

  • Later work showed that this context dependence is a general characteristic of molecular networks. This was demonstrated with a toy model of a gene-regulatory network

  • We use genome-scale metabolic network modeling to examine for the first time the latent function of enzymes as modifiers that can suppress or amplify the impact of mutations in the phenotype

  • We examined the significance of each metabolic enzyme on how mutations impact the growth rate, which is regarded here as a case study of a complex phenotype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The presence of particular genetic variants buffers the effect of mutations This result helps explain the robustness observed in biological phenotypes and was already discussed–under the notion of canalization–in early studies of development [6,7,8]. The unveiling of this hidden variation after perturbation was reported as a decline of robustness This is not necessarily so [11, 12]: two systems presenting the same robustness can expose cryptic variation linked to mutations which are neutral depending on the system they emerge (conditional neutrality) [10,11,12]. A second general scenario corresponds to the case in which some genetic variants potentiate the functional consequences of mutations what can eventually promote the rapid evolution of new traits [13, 14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call