Abstract

As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration.

Highlights

  • Regarding the materials and method, it should be made clear that this article presents a pilot exploratory study based on a sample of convenience that is used to show that hunting conceptual metaphors are applied to the discursive representation of the experiences of certain women regarding love, seduction and the search for a partner

  • It can be concluded that the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc

  • The source domain of the hunt is applied to the discursive representation of love, seduction and the search for a partner in the texts examined

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ideological dimension of metaphor is an area of increasing interest for scholars nowadays (Charteris Black 2004, 2017; Goatly 2007; López Rodríguez 2009; Deignan 2010; Koller 2014; Hart 2017; Musolff 2017; Ng 2018). It is well known that one of the aims of studies in critical discourse analysis (CDA ) is to examine the complex manifestations of power and ideology in discourse. Metaphors are especially revealing in this respect. Very early within this tradition, analysts were well aware of the role of metaphors in the enactment of ideologies and the social implications that the choice of one metaphor over another has in the picture of the world it presents.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call