Abstract
PurposeWomen are underrepresented at scientific conferences, decreasing the visibility of female role models, which are vital for aspiring young female scientists. This investigation aimed to evaluate female representation at the German Society of Urology's (GSoU) annual meeting.MethodsThe programs of the GSoU meeting of 2011, 2018, 2019 and the virtual conference in 2020 were retrospectively quantified by gender and categorized by chair or speaker, type, and topic of the session. Descriptive analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify gender inequity and variables influencing gender distribution. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsA total of 2.504 chairs and speakers were invited to the GSoU meeting in 2018 and 2019. Female speakers or chairs were represented in 17.8%, indicating a gender gap of 64.7%. There were significant differences between session type, topic, and gender distribution for chairs and speakers. The topic surgical techniques were independent variables for both, underrepresented female chairs and speakers, respectively (p < 0.001). Vocational policy and plenary session were not represented by any female chair in 2011, 2018, and 2019. In comparison, the gender gap in 2011 was 74.2%, indicating a gap reduction of 1.2% per year. In a selected virtual program in 2020, the gender gap increased to 70.4%.ConclusionThere is still a significant discrepancy between gender representation at the GSoU annual meetings, and gender equity is currently not expected before 50 years. Future efforts should address the implementation of established guidelines for achieving gender equity at urological conferences.
Highlights
Female physicians are mostly underrepresented at scientific medical conferences [1, 2]
Several session topics and types were not represented by any female chair and/or speaker, plenary session and vocational policies (Online Resource 1 and 2)
Considering the virtual meeting due to COVID pandemic with a highly selected program, the gender gap increased to 70.4%, with a total female representation of only 13.4%
Summary
Female physicians are mostly underrepresented at scientific medical conferences [1, 2]. Underrepresentation occurs when the number of female physicians in visible positions is less than the proportion expected based on the number of. The lack of female representation as role models and mentors has been identified as a crucial barrier to promoting in surgical specialities and academic internal medicine [3, 4]. Mostly female discrimination puts women’s careers at a disadvantage and not the lack of appropriately skilled women [5]. Female representation at conferences is an essential facet of gender equity [2]. Cochran et al [4] identified the most significant barriers for women in academic departments of surgery are based on women’s experiences.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have