Abstract

Empirical studies of farm outcomes that rely on survey data often find important roles for education and gender. However, relatively few studies consider either field of study or gender of the decision maker (as opposed to gender of the survey respondent). This paper evaluates how the field of education and gender of decision makers correlate with profitability, farm management, future intentions, risk and norms, and adoption of novel technologies in New Zealand, explicitly accounting for the fact that many farming households make decisions jointly. Findings show that post-secondary education in a relevant field is a strong predictor of farm outcomes such as adoption of best management practices, plans to convert or intensify land use, risk tolerance, and adoption of novel technologies. Male sole decision makers (vis-à-vis joint decision makers) are more likely to have adopted best management practices and to have greater risk tolerance while female sole decision makers have adopted fewer novel technologies. These results have important implications for policy makers and extension officers who wish to encourage the uptake of best management practices and who wish to better understand future land-use change.

Highlights

  • The relationships between gender and farming outcomes and between educational attainment and farming outcomes are well studied in agricultural economics, but the measurement of gender and education has been problematic

  • The empirical analysis is based on the 2015 Survey of Rural Decision Makers (SRDM) [41,42,43], a large, Internet-based survey that covers both commercial production and lifestyle farming in all 16 regions of New Zealand

  • Farmers with relevant post-secondary education are 3.6% more likely to have fenced waterways (p < 0.10), 8.5% more likely to have implemented a plan for managing soils (p < 0.01), and 6.7% more likely to have implemented a plan for managing pugging (p < 0.05) than their counterparts with secondary education or less

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationships between gender and farming outcomes and between educational attainment and farming outcomes are well studied in agricultural economics, but the measurement of gender and education has been problematic. Using years completed as an indicator of education, they conclude that the relationship between education and profitability is strongly positive, in modernizing agricultural systems. Griliches [2] observes that the number of years of education attained by farmers is strongly and positively associated with US farm productivity. One possible explanation for the relationship between educational attainment and productivity is that farmers with more education may more readily adapt to new market opportunities [3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call