Abstract

Because of the increasing price of jadeite, many fake species have appeared on the market. We recognized three pieces of fake black jadeite that had been placed among real black jadeite. In this study we conducted a mineralogical investigation of the three fakes and the real jadeite by using FTIR and XRD techniques; in addition, we performed in situ major, minor and trace element chemical characterization based on EPMA-WDS and LA-ICP-MS techniques. The three imitations have different components, dominated by katophorite (97%), augite (66%) and anorthite (97%). In contrast, the real jadeite sample contains more than 99% jadeite. Unlike previous reports on black jadeite, the dark omphacite exsolution around the jadeite cleavage is the chromogenic factor in the present study, whereas the black color of the imitations comes from light absorption by major melanocratic minerals and widespread fine graphite. We propose that 2–4 sharp bands between 600 and 800 cm−1 of FTIR and the 2.42 and 2.49 Å peaks of XRD can be used to discriminate black jadeite from imitations. Even though natural jadeite deposits are being exhausted, materials of the three natural imitations were determined not to be suitable for jewelry due to low hardness, widespread occurrence and unknown injury of the radioactive elements thorium and uranium. Otherwise, they could enhance value and be ideal for large-sized ornaments of fine design.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call