Abstract
Although observing other’s gaze and body movements provides a crucial source of information to successfully interact with other people, it remains unclear whether observers weigh differently these cues and whether the convergence of gaze and body’s directions determines facilitation effects. Here we aim to shed more light on this issue by testing the reliance upon these cues from both a behavioral and a neurophysiological perspective in a social interactive context. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the convergence between the direction of an actor’s upper limb movement and gaze direction while he attempts to socially interact with the participants observing the scene. We determined the direction of gaze as well as the duration of participants’ ocular fixations during the observation of the scene. In Experiment 2, we measured and correlated the effect of the body/gaze manipulation on corticospinal excitability and on the readiness to interact—a disposition to engage in social situations. Eye-tracking data revealed that participants fixated chiefly the actor’s head when his hand and gaze directions were divergent. Possibly a strategy to disambiguate the scene. Whereas participants mainly fixated the actor’s hand when he performed an interactive request toward the participants. From a neurophysiological point of view, the more participants felt involved in the interaction, the lower was motor preparation in the muscle potentially needed to fulfill the actor’s request. We contend that social contexts are more likely to elicit motor preparation compared to non-social ones, and that muscular inhibition is a necessary mechanism in order to prevent unwanted overt reactions during action observation tasks.
Highlights
When interacting with another agent, gaze direction represents key information for social communication [1,2]
Longer fixations were found for the Interactive Request Action, Divergent Gaze, t(57) = -2.86, p < 0.001, d = 0.71, and the Non Interactive Action, Divergent Gaze, t(57) = -4.34, p < 0.001 d = 1.07, conditions compared to the Non Interactive Action, Convergent Gaze condition
To control for nonspecific changes in corticospinal excitability that could have biased the results, for each muscle we compared the mean raw motor evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitudes recorded at the beginning and at the end of the experimental session
Summary
When interacting with another agent, gaze direction represents key information for social communication [1,2]. People have the tendency to attend to an interacting agent’s gaze [3,4,5,6]. Induces reflexive shifts of attention in the onlooker [7,8,9], provides information regarding where and to what one is paying attention [10], and it may activate ‘joint attention’ between two agents [11]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have