Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by a sequence of pathological changes, which are commonly assessed in vivo using various brain imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Currently, the most approaches to analyze statistical associations between regions and imaging modalities rely on Pearson correlation or linear regression models. However, these models are prone to spurious correlations arising from uninformative shared variance and multicollinearity. Notably, there are no appropriate multivariate statistical models available that can easily integrate dozens of multicollinear variables derived from such data, being able to utilize the additional information provided from the combination of data sources. Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) can estimate the conditional dependency from given data, which is conceptually expected to closely reflect the underlying causal relationships between various variables. Hence, we applied GGMs to assess multimodal regional brain alterations in AD. We obtained data from N = 972 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The mean amyloid load (AV45-PET), glucose metabolism (FDG-PET), and gray matter volume (MRI) were calculated for each of the 108 cortical and subcortical brain regions. GGMs were estimated using a Bayesian framework for the combined multimodal data and the resulted conditional dependency networks were compared to classical covariance networks based on Pearson correlation. Additionally, graph-theoretical network statistics were calculated to determine network alterations associated with disease status. The resulting conditional dependency matrices were much sparser (≈10% density) than Pearson correlation matrices (≈50% density). Within imaging modalities, conditional dependency networks yielded clusters connecting anatomically adjacent regions. For the associations between different modalities, only few region-specific connections were detected. Network measures such as small-world coefficient were significantly altered across diagnostic groups, with a biphasic u-shape trajectory, i.e., increased small-world coefficient in early mild cognitive impairment (MCI), similar values in late MCI, and decreased values in AD dementia patients compared to cognitively normal controls. In conclusion, GGMs removed commonly shared variance among multimodal measures of regional brain alterations in MCI and AD, and yielded sparser matrices compared to correlation networks based on the Pearson coefficient. Therefore, GGMs may be used as alternative to thresholding-approaches typically applied to correlation networks to obtain the most informative relations between variables.

Highlights

  • Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by a range of pathological brain alterations that can be assessed in vivo using various neuroimaging methods, including MRI and PET

  • We suggest the application of Gaussian graphical models (GGMs), which are able to estimate the partial correlation between various multicollinear predictors (Hastie et al, 2013, chapter 7.3)

  • When considering inter-modal associations, i.e., between different imaging modalities, we obtained a consistent pattern of significant positive intra-regional conditional dependency for the pairs amyloid-β deposition and metabolism with a mean partial correlation of ρ = 0.21 for 43 significant associations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by a range of pathological brain alterations that can be assessed in vivo using various neuroimaging methods, including MRI and PET. There is still an unmet need for appropriate analysis methods for assessing statistical associations between individual brain regions and between different pathology markers derived from multiple neuroimaging modalities. Summary statistics based on graph-theory have been proposed (Watts and Strogatz, 1998; Stam et al, 2006) and are currently widely applied (Buckner et al, 2009; Zhou et al, 2012; Sepulcre et al, 2013, 2017) This approach has been criticized, as for instance, group differences in small-worldness of the brain network might be sensitive to the specific density threshold (Hlinka et al, 2017; Mårtensson et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.