Abstract

BackgroundThe administration of a 166Ho scout dose is available as an alternative to 99mTc particles for pre-treatment imaging in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT). It has been reported that the 166Ho scout dose may be more accurate for the prediction of microsphere distribution and the associated therapy planning. The aim of the current study is to compare the scintigraphic imaging characteristics of both isotopes, considering the objectives of the pre-treatment imaging using clinically geared phantoms.MethodsPlanar and SPECT/CT images were obtained using a NEMA image quality phantom in different phantom setups and another body-shaped phantom with several inserts. The influence of collimator type, count statistics, dead time effects, isotope properties and patient obesity on spatial resolution, contrast recovery and the detectability of small activity accumulations was investigated. Furthermore, the effects of the imaging characteristics on personalized dosimetry are discussed.ResultsThe images with 99mTc showed up to 3 mm better spatial resolution, up to two times higher contrast recovery and significantly lower image noise than those with 166Ho. The contrast-to-noise ratio was up to five times higher for 99mTc than for 166Ho. Only when using 99mTc all activity-filled spheres could be distinguished from the activity-filled background. The measurements mimicking an obese patient resulted in a degraded image quality for both isotopes.ConclusionsOur measurements demonstrate better scintigraphic imaging properties for 99mTc compared to 166Ho in terms of spatial resolution, contrast recovery, image noise, and lesion detectability. While the 166Ho scout dose promises better prediction of the microsphere distribution, it is important to consider the inferior imaging characteristics of 166Ho, which may affect individualized treatment planning in SIRT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.