Abstract
AbstractA galvanostatic test panel design consisting of a coated and scribed 7075‐T6 Al alloy as a working electrode and an uncoated through‐hole 316 stainless‐steel fastener as a counter electrode has been used to accelerate galvanic corrosion and compare various primer coatings and pretreatments and different impressed passed currents in an ASTM G85‐A2 environment. The relative humidity, chloride concentration, and impressed current magnitude were changed to investigate their effects on galvanic corrosion. During the chamber exposure, the electrochemical measurements showed fluctuations in the measured current and potential. Various corrosion morphologies, depths, and volume loss were recorded for panels with different coating systems. Electrochemical measurements, optical profilometry, and photography were used to characterize and measure the corrosion performance of different coating systems. Also, electrochemical impedance spectrometry was used to compare the corrosion resistance and porosity of different coating systems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
