G Proteins

Abstract

HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 100, No. 8G Proteins Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBG ProteinsMore Than Transducers of Receptor-Generated Signals? Stefan Engelhardt and Francesca Rochais Stefan EngelhardtStefan Engelhardt From the Rudolf Virchow Center, DFG Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Wuerzburg, Germany. Search for more papers by this author and Francesca RochaisFrancesca Rochais From the Rudolf Virchow Center, DFG Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Wuerzburg, Germany. Search for more papers by this author Originally published27 Apr 2007https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000266971.15127.e8Circulation Research. 2007;100:1109–1111Signaling through the activation of G proteins represents the most widely used signaling pathway in mammalian biology.1,2 Classically, a transmembrane receptor comprising seven transmembrane domains (G protein-coupled receptor, GPCR) is activated by an extracellular stimulus and transduces this information to heterotrimeric G proteins through a conformational change of the receptor protein. Throughout evolution, a large variety of GPCRs has evolved to detect a wide spectrum of signals ranging from photons and odorants to endogenous neurotransmitters and hormones such as the catecholamines. Consequently, the majority of currently used drugs act on GPCRs. On receptor-mediated activation of the G protein α-subunit, the bound GDP is exchanged against GTP and both the GTP-bound α-subunit as well as the βγ-subunits may activate downstream targets (Figure). As a GTPase, the α-subunit then rapidly initiates its own inactivation through GTP-hydrolysis. This GTPase cycle of G protein activation and deactivation is subject to regulation by the RGS family of proteins (regulators of G protein signaling) that activate the GTPase function and thereby negatively regulate signaling of GPCRs.3,4Download figureDownload PowerPointG protein dependent signaling in the cardiovascular system. Classically G proteins are activated through agonist occupied G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the inactive state, the G protein α-subunit is bound to GDP, with a rapid exchange against GTP on activation. Both the α-subunit and the βγ-subunits can then activate diverse downstream signaling cascades. In addition G protein dependent signaling can be regulated independent from GPCR-activation through activators of G protein signaling (AGS) and nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK). Membrane-bound NDPK B transfers a high energy phosphate onto G β-subunits, which is then transferred onto GDP to form GTP. It thereby localizes GTP-supply to the vincinity of G protein α-subunits and mediates local, receptor-independent activation of G protein α-subunits. It remains to be determined, whether β-subunit phosphorylation also interferes with βγ-dependent signaling to downstream effectors. In addition, NDPK B may act as protein kinases phosphorylating target proteins such as Ca-regulated potassium channels (KCa1.3).Although the paradigm of G protein activation through activated GPCRs is generally accepted, there have been several reports, that G proteins can be activated independently from GPCR-activation. Lanier and coworkers have described a class of G protein interacting proteins, which they termed activators of G protein signaling (AGS-proteins5). AGS-proteins directly interact with G protein α-subunits and βγ dimers and are thereby capable to initiate G protein dependent signaling independent of GPCR-activation.In addition, several reports have implied nucleoside-diphosphate kinase (NDPK) as a direct activator of G protein signaling. Originally believed to act solely as a source for GTP formed from GDP and ATP, NDPK increasingly appears to act as a highly integrated signaling molecule.6,7 Early reports described G protein activation through NDPK through a yet undefined mechanism and described a complex of NDPK and the stimulatory G protein (Gs).8 Subsequently it was shown, that the B isoform of NDPK acts as a histidine kinase that phosphorylates Gβ at His266.9 This high energetic phosphate permits phosphate transfer onto GDP to form GTP in a local compartment in close vicinity to Gα subunits and thus mediates local activation of G proteins.In this issue of Circulation Research, Hippe and colleagues now demonstrate, that this unique mechanism of G protein activation occurs in the mammalian heart and that it significantly contributes to the basal formation of cAMP.10 On expression of a mutant βγ-complex specifically lacking His266 (and thus NDPK-mediated Gα activation), basal cAMP formation fell to less than 50%. A similar decrease of basal cAMP formation was observed on knockdown of NDPK B. Interestingly, β-adrenergic receptor mediated cAMP formation and contractility were unaffected by disruption of NDPK-mediated Gβ-phosphorylation. Thus NDPK-mediated Gα activation must be regarded as a separate pathway of G protein activation (Figure).NDPKs are ubiquitious and constitutively expressed enzymes that provide the formation of nucleoside triphosphates. Despite their early discovery and biochemical characterization more than 40 years ago, NDPKs have long been thought to act solely through the transfer of a γ-phosphate group onto nucleoside-5-diphosphates by a mechanism involving the formation of a high energy phosphate intermediate on a histidine residue. However, evidence is accumulating, that NDPKs may act in addition as protein kinases. This has been recently demonstrated for a calcium regulated potassium channel KCa1.3.11 NDPK-mediated histidine phosphorylation was shown to be required for KCa1.3-activation, which is expressed in T cells and blood vessels.12 Another target of NDPK with likely cardiovascular relevance is AMP-kinase.13 NDPK mediated Gβ-phosphorylation involves aspects of both the protein kinase and the nucleotide kinase mode of NDPK activity. On the one hand, Gβ may serve as a simple intermediate storing station for high energetic phosphate transferred on to GDP. On the other hand, histidine phosphorylation of Gβ may alter Gβ-function in a yet to be determined way. Direct evidence for such a mode of action is still missing, but the close vicinity of the His266-residue to the interaction plane on Gβ that interacts both with the Gα-subunit as well as with established downstream effectors of βγ-subunits14 renders this possibility not unlikely. βγ-Subunits regulate effector enzymes like PI3Kγ, ACII, PLCβ and G protein coupled receptor kinases 2 and 3 (GRKs). Increasing evidence points toward βγ-dependent signals as critical regulators of cardiac pathology, namely myocardial remodelling. Both cardiomyocyte-specific inhibition of βγ-dependent signaling with a C-terminal GRK2-fragment15 as well as GRK-independent scavenging of βγ-subunits16 inhibited myocardial remodeling and the development of cardiac failure in experimental animal models. It will be crucial to assess how βγ-dependent signaling pathways react on manipulation of NDPK-activity.Given the central role of NDPKs in mammalian biology, many fundamental characteristics of the enzyme family are still unknown to date. Whether and how NDPK activity is regulated is largely unclear at the moment. Some recent publications indicate that intracellular translocation and complex formations may play an important role.13,17 Taking into account that the intermediately phosphorylated histidine residues on Gβ but not those on NDPK B are substrates for a recently identified phosphohistidine phosphatase,18 it will be interesting to see, whether the nucleotide kinase and the histidine kinase functions are subject to individual regulation. Similarly, the downstream effectors of NDPKs, that have been identified likely represent only a small fraction of the entire picture (Figure).Although the receptor-induced regulation of cAMP synthesis has been intensively studied, comparably little is know about the regulation of basal cAMP formation. Hippe and colleagues provide the first evidence that NDPK B-dependent activation of Gs contributes to the formation of basal cAMP in primary cardiac myocytes. In contrast, the β-adrenergic receptor induced cAMP formation is not altered on disruption of NDPK mediated Gβ phosphorylation. Does this proof independence of GPCR induced G protein activation? These experiments were performed in the presence of propranolol, effectively ruling out signaling through spontaneous activity of β-adrenergic receptors. However, other Gs protein coupled GPCRs may still contribute to basal cAMP formation in cardiac myocytes. This would be plausible also with regard to the fact, that spontaneous activation and G protein coupling of GPCRs have been suggested to involve different modes of interaction than agonist-induced G protein activation.19 Studying the effect of NDPK mediated Gβ phosphorylation in a cellular system with pronounced spontaneous activity of a Gs coupled GPCR may yield further insight in this respect.In addition to spontaneously active GPCRs, basal cAMP may be derived from the spontaneous activity of G proteins as well as that of adenylyl cyclases. The work of Hippe et al indicates, that a major contribution to basal cAMP formation in cardiac myocytes originates upstream from adenylyl cyclase, likely with a significant contribution of Gs. In this respect, a direct comparison of the extent of cAMP-reduction through NDPK-inhibition to that achieved by inverse agonists at the β-adrenergic receptors will be of interest.The work of Hippe et al gains additional importance through the upregulation of NDPK, that has been observed in the membrane fraction of failing myocardium.17 Although total NDPK-levels appear to be unchanged, there is a relative enrichment of NDPK in the membrane fraction of failing myocardium. The mechanism underlying this translocation of NDPK is still unknown. However, the elevation of the membrane-associated NDPK was partially prevented in patients with congestive heart failure which have been treated with β-adrenergic receptor antagonists. In agreement with these data, the progression of cardiac hypertrophy induced by chronic β-adrenergic receptor stimulation was paralleled by the increase in membrane-associated NDPK.17 Consistent with recent reports showing NDPK translocation by stimulation of GPCRs,20,21 these data suggest that sustained stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors increases association of NDPK with the plasma membrane. It is tempting to speculate, that this leads to enhanced formation of basal cAMP and thereby contributes to progression of the disease. This exciting question ultimately needs to be addressed in a relevant in vivo model, possibly through the use of Gβ mutants or suppression of NDPK expression.Taken together, the findings of Hippe et al add another facet to the complex function of G protein βγ-subunits in cardiomyocytes. NDPK-mediated His266-phosphorylation of Gβ appears to localize GTP-supply to Gα-subunits and thereby contributes to G protein activity independent from GPCR-activation.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Sources of FundingS.E. is supported by the Rudolf Virchow Center/DFG Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Trigen, Sanofi-Aventis and the Bavarian Ministry of Economics. We would like to thank the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung-Heart Failure Network (TP7) and the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Wuerzburg for generous support. F.R. was supported by a fellowship of the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Stefan Engelhardt, MD PhD, Rudolf Virchow Center, DFG Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Wuerzburg, Versbacher Strasse 9, 97078 Wuerzburg, Germany. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Gilman AG. G proteins: transducers of receptor-generated signals. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987; 56: 615–649.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85: 1159–1204.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Riddle EL, Schwartzman RA, Bond M, Insel PA. Multi-tasking RGS proteins in the heart: the next therapeutic target? Circ Res. 2005; 96: 401–411.LinkGoogle Scholar4 Wieland T, Lutz S, Chidiac P. Regulators of G protein signalling: a spotlight on emerging functions in the cardiovascular system. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2007; 7: 201–207.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Blumer JB, Smrcka AV, Lanier SM. Mechanistic pathways and biological roles for receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling. Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 113: 488–506.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Kimura N, Shimada N, Ishijima Y, Fukuda M, Takagi Y, Ishikawa N. Nucleoside diphosphate kinases in mammalian signal transduction systems: recent development and perspective. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2003; 35: 41–47.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Wieland T. Interaction of nucleoside diphosphate kinase B with heterotrimeric G protein βγ dimers: consequences on G protein activation and stability. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007; 374: 373–383.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Kimura N, Shimada N. Direct interaction between membrane-associated nucleoside diphosphate kinase and GTP-binding protein (Gs), and its regulation by hormones and guanine nucleotides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988; 151: 248–256.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Cuello F, Schulze RA, Heemeyer F, Meyer HE, Lutz S, Jakobs KH, Niroomand F, Wieland T. Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by a high energy phosphate transfer via nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) B and Gβ subunits. Complex formation of NDPK B with Gβγ dimers and phosphorylation of His-266 in Gβ. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 7220–7226.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Hippe HJ, Luedde M, Lutz S, Koehler H, Eschenhagen T, Frey N, Katus HA, Wieland T, Niroomand F. Regulation of cardiac cAMP synthesis and contractility by nucleoside diphosphate kinase B/G protein βγ dimer complexes. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 1191–1199.LinkGoogle Scholar11 Srivastava S, Li Z, Ko K, Choudhury P, Albaqumi M, Johnson AK, Yan Y, Backer JM, Unutmaz D, Coetzee WA, Skolnik EY. Histidine phosphorylation of the potassium channel KCa3.1 by nucleoside diphosphate kinase B is required for activation of KCa3.1 and CD4 T cells. Mol Cell. 2006; 24: 665–675.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Si H, Heyken WT, Wolfle SE, Tysiac M, Schubert R, Grgic I, Vilianovich L, Giebing G, Maier T, Gross V, Bader M, de Wit C, Hoyer J, Kohler R. Impaired endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated dilations and increased blood pressure in mice deficient of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 537–544.LinkGoogle Scholar13 Crawford RM, Treharne KJ, Arnaud-Dabernat S, Daniel JY, Foretz M, Viollet B, Mehta A. Protein kinase CK2 acts as a signal molecule switching between the NDPK-A/AMPK α1 complex and NDPK-B. FASEB J. 2007; 21: 88–98.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Ford CE, Skiba NP, Bae H, Daaka Y, Reuveny E, Shekter LR, Rosal R, Weng G, Yang CS, Iyengar R, Miller RJ, Jan LY, Lefkowitz RJ, Hamm HE. Molecular basis for interactions of G protein βγ subunits with effectors. Science. 1998; 280: 1271–1274.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Rockman HA, Chien KR, Choi DJ, Iaccarino G, Hunter JJ, Ross JJ, Lefkowitz RJ, Koch WJ. Expression of a β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor prevents the development of myocardial failure in gene-targeted mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 7000–7005.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Li Z, Laugwitz KL, Pinkernell K, Pragst I, Baumgartner C, Hoffmann E, Rosport K, Munch G, Moretti A, Humrich J, Lohse MJ, Ungerer M. Effects of two Gβγ-binding proteins-N-terminally truncated phosducin and β-adrenergic receptor kinase C terminus (βARKct)–in heart failure. Gene Ther. 2003; 10: 1354–1361.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Lutz S, Mura RA, Hippe HJ, Tiefenbacher C, Niroomand F. Plasma membrane-associated nucleoside diphosphate kinase (nm23) in the heart is regulated by β-adrenergic signaling. Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 140: 1019–1026.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Maurer A, Wieland T, Meissl F, Niroomand F, Mehringer R, Krieglstein J, Klumpp S. The β-subunit of G proteins is a substrate of protein histidine phosphatase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 334: 1115–1120.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Zhou YY, Cheng H, Song LS, Wang D, Lakatta EG, Xiao RP. Spontaneous β2-adrenergic signaling fails to modulate L-type Ca2+ current in mouse ventricular myocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 1999; 56: 485–493.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Gallagher BC, Parrott KA, Szabo G, de SOA. Receptor activation regulates cortical, but not vesicular localization of NDP kinase. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 3239–3250.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Rochdi MD, Laroche G, Dupre E, Giguere P, Lebel A, Watier V, Hamelin E, Lepine MC, Dupuis G, Parent JL. Nm23-H2 interacts with a G protein-coupled receptor to regulate its endocytosis through a Rac1-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 18981–18989.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Bondos S, Dunker A and Uversky V (2022) Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling, Cell Communication and Signaling, 10.1186/s12964-022-00821-7, 20:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022. Fonin A, Darling A, Kuznetsova I, Turoverov K and Uversky V (2019) Multi-functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder-based proteoforms, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1, 76:22, (4461-4492), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019. Wang L, Li X, Zhao Y, Fang C, Lian Y, Gou W, Han T and Zhu X (2015) Insights into the mechanism of CXCL12-mediated signaling in trophoblast functions and placental angiogenesis, Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 10.1093/abbs/gmv064, 47:9, (663-672), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015. Liu L and Zhang R (2014) Intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Neuroscience Bulletin, 10.1007/s12264-014-1475-7, 30:6, (999-1009), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014. Trusov Y, Chakravorty D and Botella J (2013) Fusarium oxysporum Infection Assays in Arabidopsis G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in Plants, 10.1007/978-1-62703-532-3_7, (67-72), . Wang Q, Zhao X and Pu X (2011) Proteome analysis of the left ventricle in the vitamin D3 and nicotine-induced rat vascular calcification model, Journal of Proteomics, 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.12.010, 74:4, (480-489), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011. Nagler J, Cavileer T, Hunter S, Drew R, Okutsu T, Sakamoto T and Yoshizaki G (2011) Non-sex specific genes associated with the secondary mitotic period of primordial germ cell proliferation in the gonads of embryonic rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) , Molecular Reproduction and Development, 10.1002/mrd.21277, 78:3, (181-187), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011. Matise M and Wang H (2011) Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in the Developing CNS Growth Factors in Development, 10.1016/B978-0-12-385975-4.00010-3, (75-117), . Dai P, Tang Z, Ruan P, Bajinka O, Liu D and Tan Y (2021) Gimap5 Inhibits Lung Cancer Growth by Interacting With M6PR, Frontiers in Oncology, 10.3389/fonc.2021.699847, 11 Sun X and Li Q (2018) Prostaglandin EP2 receptor: Novel therapeutic target for human cancers (Review), International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3744 April 27, 2007Vol 100, Issue 8 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000266971.15127.e8PMID: 17463326 Originally publishedApril 27, 2007 KeywordscAMPG protein signalingnucleoside diphosphate kinasesβ-adrenergic receptorPDF download Advertisement