Abstract
In their critique of our analysis of national pandemic influenza preparedness plans in Europe, Nicoll and Kaiser raise a number of issues
Highlights
RSS Feed Follow us on Twitter Subs cribe Uns ubs cribe Contact Sitem ap Announcem ents
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. In their critique of our analysis of national pandemic influenza preparedness plans in Europe, Nicoll and Kaiser raise a number of issues [1,2,3]
Through combining the findings of preparedness, developed by use both of indicators and country visits, they concluded that ‘expert opinion at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) coincides with many of the overall points made by the researchers.’
Summary
RSS Feed Follow us on Twitter Subs cribe Uns ubs cribe Contact Sitem ap Announcem ents. Av ailable online: http://w w w .eurosurv eillance.org/View Article.aspx?ArticleId=2953
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
