Abstract

This paper poses a major question regarding the choice of space group for scapolite mineral group members. An artificial boundary is typically drawn between space groups I4/m and P42/n when solving the structures of scapolites within the marialite–meionite series. The authors debate if solving the crystal structure in lower symmetries is justified. The choice of space group here is attributed to Si-Al ordering of the framework, and it is shown that the interstitial framework cations and anions have an accompanying role in that decision. Some answers on the ranges and limits of distribution of space groups of scapolite members in the marialite–meionite series, and the manifestations of violation of the Lowenstein rule or the so-called aluminum avoidance rule are presented. Modern physical methods (SEM-EDS and SXDA) are employed in the study to properly analyze the solid solution series in detail. New crystal–chemical data are reported for scapolite samples from different localities. An analysis was made for the types of possible Al-O-Al bonds that can occur in the structures at different Al:Si ratios and their influence on Al-Si ordering. Finally, genetic considerations about Al-Si ordering in the framework construction during the mineral formation processes are proposed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call