Abstract
Diagnosis of HIV-associated histoplasmosis remains challenging. Our objective was to compare the performances of (1→3)-β-D-Glucan (BDG) and Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) antigen for the diagnosis of HIV-associated histoplasmosis. We performed a diagnostic accuracy study using frozen primary serum specimens issued from consecutive hospitalized people living with HIV (PLWH) and blindly tested for BDG and GM using Fungitell® and PlateliaTM Aspergillus, respectively. We included 121 sera with 92 HIV-associated histoplasmosis cases and 29 negative controls. At thresholds of 150 pg/mL and 0.5 for BDG and GM, sensitivity and specificity were respectively: 95% [85-100] vs 90% [77-100], 52% [34-70] vs 83% [69-97]. ROC curves showed AUCs of 0.82 [0.68-0.91] vs 0.92 [0.80-0.98] for BDG and GM, respectively. Post-test probabilities showed best performances at lowest thresholds for a negative testing of both BDG and GM, and at the 0.7 threshold for a positive GM test. If BDG alone may rule out histoplasmosis when negative, GM alone, either positive or negative, showed the best performances for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Given poorer performances of BDG and GM compared to Histoplasma antigen detection assays commercially available, they should be considered as an alternative in settings where Histoplasma antigen detection assays remain unavailable. However, this study essentially provides insights in the performances of fungal biomarkers in disseminated histoplasmosis and does not represent recommendations for best practices.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.