Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of fundamentalism and the crisis of the education system in Russia. The authors demonstrate the subjective perception of the crisis of education either as a public institution in general or as a specific education system in specific historical circumstances. The study aims to establish or refute the existence of fundamentalist tendencies in the contemporary Russian educational discourse, as well as to identify the validity of using the term “fundamentalism” with regard to the philosophy of education and pedagogy. The research methods included case studies, comparative textual analysis, as well as historical-cultural and comparative methods. The authors note that the term “fundamentalism” was coined in science at the end of the 19th century. It had a completely different meaning, namely, a literal interpretation of a religious text within the framework of a particular tradition. The authors analyze a set of specific situations associated at first glance with the erroneous use of the term “fundamentalism” in Russian scientific articles to mean a generalization of the fundamental and academic nature of education, as well as substantiate the attitude according to which the application of this characteristic is not erroneous at all, but is a manifestation of some features of a specific form of fundamentalism, namely, academic fundamentalism.

Highlights

  • It is difficult to find in Russian pedagogy and philosophy of education a review article or monograph that somehow does not proceed from the crisis of education, considering it either as a public institution in general or as a particular system in specific historical circumstances

  • What are the contradictions on which this crisis is based, and what is its essence? According to the above-mentioned author, this is a contradiction of the traditional Russian education system, which was based on the principles of Enlightenment, and aimed at “preserving and reproducing spiritual experience, and socializing the individual” [1: 60]

  • The author further concludes that the end of the 20th – the beginning of the 21st century is characterized by a certain “revolution” in education and that it was “caused by the crisis of the classical and post-classical education systems and their traditional principles – fundamentalism and academism” [1: 60]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is difficult to find in Russian pedagogy and philosophy of education a review article or monograph that somehow does not proceed from the crisis of education, considering it either as a public institution in general or as a particular system in specific historical circumstances. The author further concludes that the end of the 20th – the beginning of the 21st century is characterized by a certain “revolution” in education and that it was “caused by the crisis of the classical and post-classical education systems and their traditional principles – fundamentalism and academism” [1: 60].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call