Abstract

It should prove possible, with the newer physical forms of catalogs, to provide users with greatly enriched access to library materials. There already is evidence that additional types of access would prove useful. Furthermore, it is reasonable to suppose that some of the exceptional practices that were codified in earlier catalog codes existed because they represented the known needs of users. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to review some of the earlier practices pertaining to the choice of entry, name, and form of name for corporate bodies in order to identify what function or use might have been fulfilled by such practices. Three additional functions or types of use thus are identified. If catalogs are to fulfill these added functions, the implications of such types of access should be tested empirically before they are implemented.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.