Abstract

Full noncontact laser ultrasound (LUS) imaging has several distinct advantages over current medical ultrasound (US) technologies: elimination of the coupling mediums (gel/water), operator-independent image quality, improved repeatability, and volumetric imaging. Current light-based ultrasound utilizing tissue-penetrating photoacoustics (PA) generally uses traditional piezoelectric transducers in contact with the imaged tissue or carries an optical fiber detector close to the imaging site. Unlike PA, the LUS design presented here minimizes the optical penetration and specifically restricts optical-to-acoustic energy transduction at the tissue surface, maximizing the generated acoustic source amplitude. With an appropriate optical design and interferometry, any exposed tissue surfaces can become viable acoustic sources and detectors. LUS operates analogously to conventional ultrasound but uses light instead of piezoelectric elements. Here, we present full noncontact LUS results, imaging targets at ~5 cm depths and at a meter-scale standoff from the target surface. Experimental results demonstrating volumetric imaging and the first LUS images on humans are presented, all at eye- and skin-safe optical exposure levels. The progression of LUS imaging from tissue-mimicking phantoms, to excised animal tissue, to humans in vivo is shown, with validation from conventional ultrasound images. The LUS system design insights and results presented here inspire further LUS development and are a significant step toward the clinical implementation of LUS.

Highlights

  • Modern ultrasonography is well established in diagnostic and interventional medical imaging and is the most commonly used imaging modality for soft tissue[1]

  • laser ultrasound (LUS) Results and Human Imaging The LUS imaging results for porcine and human tissue demonstrate the capability of LUS to remotely and deeply image biological tissue at safe optical exposure levels

  • The tissue boundaries detected by LUS are in agreement with the tissue boundaries detected by conventional ultrasound

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern ultrasonography is well established in diagnostic and interventional medical imaging and is the most commonly used imaging modality for soft tissue[1]. Ultrasound has advantages compared to other imaging methods, including being nonionizing, relatively low cost, and portable. Conventional ultrasound imaging requires the placement of piezoelectric transducers in contact with the patient to transmit and detect reflected and scattered acoustic waves at the body surface. Compared to other imaging modalities, patient contact is a source of. The freehand reference frame and the crosssectional or slice nature of conventional ultrasound imaging generates orientation-sensitive images. These two sources of image variability generally complicate longitudinal tracking (monitoring over time) of the tissue morphology using ultrasound. MRI and CT have gantry fixed reference frames and generate volumetric images without patient contact.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call