Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI.

Abstract

BackgroundIntraoperative ultrasound(iUS) and intraoperative MRI (iMRI) are effective ways to perform resection control during glioma surgery. However, most published studies employed only one modality. Few studies have used both during surgery. How to combine these two techniques reasonably, and what advantages they could have for glioma surgery are still open questions.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients who underwent initial surgical treatment of supratentorial gliomas in our center. We utilized a full-course resection control strategy to combine iUS and iMRI: IUS for pre-resection assessment and intermediate resection control; iMRI for final resection control. The basic patient characteristics, surgical results, iMRI/iUS findings, and their impacts on surgical procedures were evaluated and reported.ResultsA total of 40 patients were included. The extent of resection was 95.43 ± 10.37%, and the gross total resection rate was 72.5%. The median residual tumor size was 6.39 cm3 (range 1.06–16.23 cm3). 5% (2/40) of patients had permanent neurological deficits after surgery. 17.5% (7/40) of patients received further resection after the first iMRI scan, resulting in four (10%) more patients achieving gross total resection. The number of iMRI scans per patient was 1.18 ± 0.38. The surgical time was 4.5 ± 3.6 hours. The pre-resection iUS scan revealed that an average of 3.8 borders of the tumor were beside sulci in 75% (30/40) patients. Intermediate resection control was utilized in 67.5% (27/40) of patients. In 37.5% (15/40) of patients, the surgical procedures were changed intraoperatively based on the iUS findings. Compared with iMRI, the sensitivity and specificity of iUS for residual tumors were 46% and 96%, respectively.ConclusionThe full-course resection control strategy by combining iUS and iMRI could be successfully implemented with good surgical results in initial glioma surgeries. This strategy might stabilize resection control quality and provide the surgeon with more intraoperative information to tailor the surgical strategy. Compared with iMRI-assisted glioma surgery, this strategy might improve efficiency by reducing the number of iMRI scans and shortening surgery time.