Abstract

The Mediterranean long shelf-life tomato (or long storage tomato) is a plant traditionally cultivated under no irrigation in the Southern regions of Italy, whose fruits have typical high sensory and nutritional quality. However, yield levels are kept low under current cultivation conditions. In this study, the effects of repeated cycles of drying and rehydration on crop productivity and nutritional quality of fruits in terms of polyphenols and carotenoids content were assessed in long shelf-life tomatoes cultivated in a typical semi-arid area of Southern Italy. The three local Sicilian landraces ‘Custonaci’, ‘Salina’ and ‘Vulcano’, and the commercial tomato hybrid ‘Faino’ (control) were submitted to three irrigation treatments: DRY (no irrigation); IRR (long-season full irrigation); REW (drought/rewatering cycles). Total 450, 4710, and 1849 m3 ha−1, were distributed in DRY, IRR, and REW, respectively. At harvest, fruit yield, polyphenols (as total, flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamoyl quinic acids-HCQA), and carotenoids contents (lycopene and β-carotene) were measured. All cultivars benefitted from very limited irrigation in REW, raising their productivity (up to +147% in ‘Vulcano’) with respect to that of plants overstressed in DRY. Irrigation water use efficiency in REW was higher than that in IRR. Water shortage in REW led to a polyphenols content of fruits that was slightly lower (171.1 μg g−1) than that in DRY, but higher than that in IRR (116.8 μg g−1). All local landraces had greater contents (>160 μg g−1) than control (113.0 μg g−1). Under REW and DRY, the two landraces ‘Salina’ and ‘Vulcano’ produced fruits with the same polyphenols and flavonoids contents. Overall, the two water stressed treatments (DRY and REW) did not differ for HCQA content (>66 μg g−1), which was significantly higher than that in the irrigated plots (<50.55 μg g−1). Lycopene content in DRY and REW exceeded 100 μg g−1; among local types, ‘Vulcano’ exhibited the highest content (106.7 μg g−1). The β-carotene content did not change in ‘Custonaci’ and ‘Salina’, whereas in ‘Vulcano’ it was greater in DRY and REW. Only in ‘Faino’ water limitation in REW exerted a clear promoting effect on β-carotene content of fruits. The results of the present study reveal how rewatering after long-lasting drought periods is beneficial to long shelf-life tomatoes in terms of productivity. Appropriate drought cycles in REW may also help the fruits to retain high nutritional levels.

Highlights

  • Polyphenols and carotenoids are bioactive compounds that have recently gained great attention by scientists and consumers for their beneficial effects on human health [1].Tomato is a good source of these two classes of secondary metabolites, and a diet rich in this vegetable has been associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular diseases and certain types of cancer [2]

  • The results of the present study reveal how rewatering after long-lasting drought periods is beneficial to long shelf-life tomatoes in terms of productivity

  • IWUE, polyphenols, and carotenoids contents were subjected to a split-plot analysis of variance using CoStat Course version 6.003 software (CoHort Software, Monterey, CA, USA), considering irrigation and cultivar and their interaction as sources of variation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tomato is a good source of these two classes of secondary metabolites, and a diet rich in this vegetable has been associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular diseases and certain types of cancer [2]. For this reason, there is a growing interest by agronomists towards an increase of the contents of these antioxidants in tomato fruits, in response to modified agronomic techniques devoted to this goal. Water saving irrigation approaches have been extensively documented as strategies to maximize the accumulation of both polyphenols and carotenoids or to control their losses in tomato fruits [3,4,5,6]. The application of water saving irrigation strategies in any specific environment requires a preliminary assessment on the risks of plant overstressing, which may adversely affect the final crop productivity [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call