Abstract

Successful propagation of information from high-fidelity sources (i.e., direct numerical simulations and large-eddy simulations) into Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations plays an important role in the emerging field of data-driven RANS modeling. Small errors carried in high-fidelity data can propagate amplified errors into the mean flow field, and higher Reynolds numbers worsen the error propagation. In this study, we compare a series of propagation methods for two cases of Prandtl's secondary flows of the second kind: square-duct flow at a low Reynolds number and roughness-induced secondary flow at a very high Reynolds number. We show that frozen treatments result in less error propagation than the implicit treatment of Reynolds stress tensor (RST), and for cases with very high Reynolds numbers, explicit and implicit treatments are not recommended. Inspired by the obtained results, we introduce the frozen treatment to the propagation of the Reynolds force vector (RFV), which leads to less error propagation. Specifically, for both cases at low and high Reynolds numbers, the propagation of RFV results in one order of magnitude lower error compared to the RST propagation. In the frozen treatment method, three different eddy-viscosity models are used to evaluate the effect of turbulent diffusion on error propagation. We show that, regardless of the baseline model, the frozen treatment of RFV results in less error propagation. We combined one extra correction term for turbulent kinetic energy with the frozen treatment of RFV, which makes our propagation technique capable of reproducing both velocity and turbulent kinetic energy fields similar to high-fidelity data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call