Abstract

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD-HSCT) and intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are 2 major comparable treatments for SAA. As the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to standard IST therapy has greatly improved the survival prognosis of SAA, whether MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG is the better choice has become a matter of debate. A study was performed involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed acquired SAA from 5 medical centers, including 48 MSD-HSCT cases and 51 IST/EPAG cases, which consisted of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or porcine-antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine plus eltrombopag. The results suggested that patients treated with MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG had similar overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 95% (P = .97). However, the event-free survival rate (EFS) of IST/EPAG (71.0%) was significantly lower than that of MSD-HSCT (89.6%), P = .04. Subgroup analysis indicated that the OS of the MSD-HSCT group was superior to that of the IST/EPAG group (100% versus 85.7%, P = .04) among those with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). Both the complete response rate (CR) and overall response rate (OR) with MSD-HSCT were significantly higher than those with IST/EPAG (CR: 79.2% versus 15.7%, P < .001; OR: 97.9% versus 72.6%, P = .001). In conclusion, IST/EPAG or MSD-HSCT treatment achieves an equally high OS in SAA, but MSD-HSCT leads to a better OS in patients with VSAA and shows advantages in improving EFS and accelerating hematopoietic reconstruction in patients with SAA.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call