Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article produces an encounter between the concept of ‘social pathology’ and the work of the philosopher Bruno Latour. It offers an introduction to Latour’s style of thought with regard to subjectivity. It argues that subjectivity is not an interiorized property of people, but a processual accomplishment from associating with different actors, which may be human or non-human. Subjectivity, from this point of view, exists in the interstice between affecting the world and being affected. Building on this Latourian perspective, the article goes on to argue that social pathologies should not be seen as a function of ‘society’, but rather as socio-material patterns of activity that spread across different spaces and places. Thus, the article posits that a more apt term for ‘social pathologies’ would be ‘socio-material pathologies’. It finishes by discussing the implications of these perspectives for both critique and methodology in social research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.