Abstract
Modern humans have larger and more globular brains when compared to other primates. Such anatomical features are further reflected in the possession of a moderately asymmetrical brain with the two hemispheres apparently rotated counterclockwise and slid anteroposteriorly on one another, in what is traditionally described as the Yakovlevian Torque. Developmental disturbance in human brain asymmetry, or lack thereof, has been linked to several cognitive disorders including schizophrenia and depression. More importantly, the presence of the Yakovlevian Torque is often advocated as the exterior manifestation of our unparalleled cognitive abilities. Consequently, studies of brain size and asymmetry in our own lineage indirectly address the question of what, and when, made us humans, trying to trace the emergence of brain asymmetry and expansion of cortical areas back in our Homo antecedents. Here we tackle this same issue studying the evolution of human brain size, shape and asymmetry on a phylogenetic tree including nineteen apes and Homo species, inclusive of our fellow ancestors. We found that a significant positive shift in the rate of brain shape evolution pertains to the clade including modern humans, Neanderthals and Homo heidelbergensis. Although the Yakovlevian Torque is well evident in these species and levels of brain asymmetry are correlated to changes in brain shape, further early Homo species possess the torque. Even though, a strong allometric component is present in hominoids brain shape variability, this component seems unrelated to asymmetry and to the rate shift we recorded. These results suggest that changes in brain size and asymmetry were not the sole factors behind the fast evolution of brain shape in the most recent Homo species. The emergence of handedness and early manifestations of cultural modernity in the archaeological record nicely coincide with the same three species sharing the largest and most rapidly evolving brains among all hominoids.
Highlights
The evolution of the human brain is one of the most intensely investigated topics in anthropology
Recent studies on endocranial volume in hominins invariably point to the presence of phenotypic leaps coinciding with the appearance of Homo (Du et al, 2018), several lines of evidence indicate that not all Homo species belong to this “unusually big-brained” class of species, the latter being restricted to Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens (Ruff et al, 1997; Rightmire, 2004; Profico et al, 2017; Diniz-Filho et al, 2019)
Positive values of PC2 correspond to a brain shape that narrows in the temporal area, whereas at negative values of the PC2, the brain endocast flattens dorsoventrally
Summary
The evolution of the human brain is one of the most intensely investigated topics in anthropology. Recent developments in virtual anthropology (Weber, 2014) are making fossil human endocasts a less rare commodity (Bruner et al, 2018), so that we are gaining scientific knowledge on our brain evolution at an unprecedented rate (Falk et al, 2000; Zollikofer and De León, 2013) Paralleling such increasing availability of brain endocasts, phylogenetic comparative methods offer ever better opportunities to study the rate and direction of phenotypic evolution, allowing the inclusion of fossil forms in studies of trait evolution. These recent findings are slowly superseding earlier reports describing a pattern of gradual brain size increase in hominins (e.g., Lee and Wolpoff, 2016)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have