Abstract
The article discusses a number of ethical conflicts related to the imperfection of recognition and decision-making algorithmization technologies based on the experience of the USA, Russia and China. Special attention is paid to social risks and the institutionalization of algorithmic ethics. The role of the risks of using autonomous weapons, shock autonomous UAVs is emphasized (the Maven project, USA). Using the example of the conflict between the American researcher Timnit Gebru and the Google managers, the institutional risks of researchers are considered. Using the example of strikes by Gig workers of Chinese digital food delivery platforms, it is shown to what social risks business algorithms can lead to if the interests of workers are not taken into account.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
