Abstract
Disagreements about the nature and utility of the social licence concept can be traced to different assumptions about the political influence of those who grant and receive it. In business, some see the social licence as a risk management framework. Critics claim that in practice it is public relations spin covering up social irresponsibility by extractive companies. Still others see it as spin used by eco-leftists to justify appropriating a veto for themselves. I review the literature on social licence grantors and grantees and propose that members of the private, public and civic sectors are mutual grantors and withholders of each others’ social licences. I invoke the concept of inter-sectoral rivalry for control the discourses that grant or withdraw social licences. When one sector dominates the others, its preferred discourse about the social licence gets enacted. The non-dominant sectors defend themselves by criticizing that justification narrative. To the extent that one sector can dominate, there will be political criticism of the social licence from the rival sectors. Empirically determining who dominates the discourse can advance both scholarly study of the social licence and the practical application of it by any type of organization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.