Abstract

This case study examines the Walt Disney Company’s foray in the Chinese market from a political economic perspective. It focuses on two film-related events: 1) the Kundun incident in 1996 that displays the ideological confrontation between Disney and China in the post-Cold War era, and 2) the production of Mulan in 1998 as both a political compromise and a strategic marketing decision for Disney to regain the Chinese market. The conflicts and negotiations between Disney and China provide a telling example to study the local operation of global capitalism, especially in terms of its interaction with the state. While many believe that the advent of globalization will open more free markets for fair competition, this study reveals how government policy intervenes in the global entertainment industry, and sheds light on the political and economic struggles behind the silver screen.

Highlights

  • This case study examines the Walt Disney Company’s foray into the Chinese market from a political economic perspective

  • More importantly in terms of how global corporations negotiate with nation states, in the Disney-China case, mutual economic interests have become a crucial incentive for both sides to resolve, or at least downplay, political differences

  • Stanley Cheung, who assumed his new post as Disney’s China managing director in 2005, told Reuters in a 2006 interview: “We look at this as an important tool to build our brand in China.”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This case study examines the Walt Disney Company’s foray into the Chinese market from a political economic perspective. Keywords Kundun; Mulan; Disney; China; Globalization; Political Economy

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.