Abstract

 
 
 Responding to the global concern on sustainable development, the consistency of localized and global/regional practices impacts the public and civil, economic, social and cultural domains. Challenges of coherent and efficient monitoring system mark the Ukraine’s path and leave space for improvement. The scrutiny of academic and institutional efforts in monitoring the sustainable development, sustainable development goals implementation reveals shortcomings and pitfalls in metadata provision, tools for data collection and processing, congruence of understanding and interpreting the concepts. The outcomes serve to substantiation of the research and educational objectives for examination of the indicator analysis design for better policy- and decision-making, public awareness, spatial patterns representation.
 
 
Highlights
Responding to the global concern on sustainable development, the policymaking faces challenges of grounded approaches in decisions-making, planning and monitoring being consistent with the international practice at both global and regional levels, in Ukraine in particular
This country finalized the adaptation of the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 (SDGs) ‒ approved by the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Summit 2015 ‒ in 2017 [7]
The transparent introduction of the 2017 National Baseline Report Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine [6] platforms the critical assessment of its pitfalls [to mention just some: 4; 12], which, in particular, pointed on the gaps of the system of collection, observation and study of statistical and administrative data of monitoring SDG
Summary
Responding to the global concern on sustainable development, the policymaking faces challenges of grounded approaches in decisions-making, planning and monitoring being consistent with the international practice at both global and regional levels, in Ukraine in particular. The transparent introduction of the 2017 National Baseline Report Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine [6] platforms the critical assessment of its pitfalls [to mention just some: 4; 12], which, in particular, pointed on the gaps of the system of collection, observation and study of statistical and administrative data of monitoring SDG. Based primarily on the above this article speculates on the scene of monitoring the sustainable development in Ukraine outlining the key standpoints of the scrutiny of academic and public efforts and arguing the prospects of the indicator analysis design for better policy- and decision-making in the country.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
