Abstract
Domestic tourism was not homogenous under state socialism but involved collective, commercial, and informal provision. Moreover, it had not been monolithically institutionalized, but was significantly influenced by different social and cultural legacies in the Czech and Slovak territories. During the transformation there was an apparent paradox, for some forms of holiday increased during the economic crisis. However, this can be seen as a logical outcome to changing economic conditions, and access to tourism actually became more socially differentiated. This paper concludes that extensive privatization has not meant a unilinear and inexorable shift to a market system, for tourism remains a bricolage of collective, market, and informal provision.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
