From clinical observation to long-term monitoring: diagnostic developments in conservative epileptology.

Abstract

The diagnostic goals in nonsurgical (conservative) epileptology differ from presurgical diagnostic aims. The resulting development of diagnostic methods in a tertiary-level epilepsy center is shown and the major technical and organizational consequences of this difference for diagnostic long-term monitoring (LTM) as opposed to presurgical LTM are investigated. A total of 133 consecutive daytime LTM investigations using radio telemetry were reviewed and seizure parameters such as type, duration, method of seizure detection, and need of mobility were evaluated and compared to presurgical LTM. Compared to presurgical LTM, partial seizures were relatively rare (17.8%) and short epileptic or nonepileptic motor events lasting <1 s, such as myoclonic, atonic, short tonic seizures, spasms, tics, or startle reactions, are frequent (34.9%). Of all seizures, 23% had no or minor ictal EEG changes, subtle symptomatology without signaling by a patient or accompanying person, and could be detected only by continuous online surveillance by an experienced EEG technician. Due to the nature of the patient population in diagnostic LTM, there is an increased need for ictal and interictal mobility (radio telemetry). LTM in conservative epileptology requires more intense human surveillance for seizure detection and increased patient mobility compared to presurgical LTM.