Abstract
Static frictional resistances were compared between Teflon-coated stainless steel and clear elastomeric ligatures used with various combinations of brackets and archwires. Stainless steel metal, polycrystalline ceramic and single crystal ceramic 0.022-inch slot brackets were used in combination with stainless steel and nickel titanium archwires, 0.018 inch and 0.016 x 0.022 inch. Friction was measured in the dry state at bracket-archwire angulations of 0, 5, 10, and 15 degrees. Moments induced by engagement of the archwires into the brackets were measured for each archwire type and bracket-archwire angulation. Teflon-coated ligatures produced less friction than elastomers for all bracket-archwire combinations. The ceramic brackets generally elicited greater frictional resistances than stainless steel brackets. Regarding both friction and control of tooth movement, these data suggest that sliding mechanics are best executed with stainless steel brackets and stainless steel archwires. Moreover, these data reveal the usefulness of Teflon-coated ligatures in minimizing the high friction of ceramic brackets when an esthetic appliance is imperative.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
