FRI413 Hormonal Menstural Suppression For Menstrual Obstruction: A Retrospective Review Of Patients With Complex Obstructed Uterovaginal Anomalies Who Underwent Surgical Management In A Tertiary Referral Centre

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: H.I. Learner: None. S.M. Creighton: None. S.A. Clarke: None. Aims: To describe the use of hormonal menstrual suppression in patients undergoing surgery for complex utero-vaginal anomalies with menstrual obstruction. Background: Obstructed menstruation can present with painful primary amenorrhea or progressive dysmenorrhea due to unilateral obstructing duplication utero-vaginal anomalies. Menstrual suppression is essential to relieve pain during investigation and surgical planning. The off licence use of progestogens, hormonal contraception and GNRH analogues is common but there is little literature describing their best use in this context. Methods: This was a retrospective case series review of patients undergoing surgical management of complex menstrual obstruction in a tertiary referral centre between 2016-2022. Data collected on age, diagnosis, symptoms, duration of symptoms, surgery, the type of endometrial suppression used and associated side effects.Patients with partial obstruction were excluded. Results: Eighty-four patients were identified from the surgical database. The median age at time of surgery was 16 years (range 11-36). Unilateral obstruction was managed in 53/84 and complete obstruction in 31/84. Diagnoses included obstructed hemi-vagina (32/84), unicornuate uterus with functional uterine remnant (19/84), transverse vaginal septum (15/84), cervical/vaginal agenesis (9/84), and Mullerian agenesis with functional uterine remnant (5/84). Symptom duration information was available in 74/84 with a median of 10 months(0-252 months). Changes to endometrial suppression treatment were required in most patients, with 50/84 (40%) remaining on their original prescription. The average number of treatment regimes was 2 (0-7). Menstrual suppression at time of surgery was Norethisterone 35/84 (42%), Continuous combined oral contraceptive pill18/84 (21%), Medroxyprogesterone 11/84 (13%), GNRH 10/84 (12%), Desogestrel 6/84 (7%), and Depo-Provera 4/84 (5%). Tibolone was used as add-back in five patients on GNRHa for more than 6 months duration of use (4/5) or hypoestrogenic side-effects (1/5) . Conclusion Menstrual suppression for pain relief is an essential component in management for complex uterovaginal anomalies. Suppression should be started at initial presentation but there is limited guidance for clinicians as to what and how to prescribe. Our study has demonstrated that this can lead to chaotic prescribing, unnecessary pain and multiple treatment changes. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023