Abstract

As the title implies the article deals with Z. Freud's psychoanalytic method in the context of M. Bakhtin's dialogue philosophy. In the article M. Bakhtin's views on the question of dialogue are analyzed, attention is focused on distinguishing between Bakhtin and Freudian categories "dialogue", "personality". Z. Freud's psychoanalytic theory is considered in the context of Bakhtin's dialogical understanding. In his early works "The Author and the Hero in Aesthetic Activities", "To the Philosophy of Action" and "Freudianism", the problem ofmthe individual and the problem of culture are linked through the idea of dialogue. Dialogue as a form of thinking and cognition of reality is considered not only as a conversation of two of its participants, but as a polyphony of voices that exist at different times. Baktin opposes the categories I and the Other in the dialogue introduces the variations of Me to Others: "I-for-myself", "I-for-Other" and "Other-for-me". A word that is dialogical in nature is a part of both internal and external speech. A look at literature, which makes it possible to constantly explore its boundaries, expand the boundaries of the unknown and seek the meaning of the written, allows you to comprehend deeper issues of dialogic relationships.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call