Abstract

The equipment capability curve is one of the bounding elements of the freeze-drying design space, and understanding it is critical to process design, transfer, and scale-up. The second bounding element of the design space is the product temperature limit beyond which the product collapses. The high cost associated with freeze-drying any product renders it crucial to operate using the most efficient cycle within the limits of the equipment and the product. In this work, we present a computational model to generate the equipment capability curve for 2 laboratory scale freeze-dryers and compare the results to experimentally generated equipment capability curves. The average deviations of the modeling results from the experiments for the 2 lyophilizers modeled are −4.8% and −7.2%. In addition, we investigate the effect of various numerical and geometric parameters on the simulated equipment capability. Among the numerical parameters, the chamber wall thermal boundary conditions exert the largest influence with a maximum value of 12.3%. Among the geometric parameters, the inclusion of the isolation valve reduces the equipment capability by 23.7%. Larger isolation valves, required for controlled nucleation technology, choke the flow in the duct at lower sublimation rates, thereby lowering the equipment capability limit.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call