Abstract

Human rights and freedoms are an essential part of building a democratic state. In turn, freedom of speech is a basic value of a democratic state. At the same time, modern democratic countries, facing terrorist and information threats, becoming information war objects, are forced to adjust the realization legal parameters of the freedom of speech, especially in the media. Variety of law, philosophical and political science publications are devoted to problems of the freedom of speech ensuring in conditions of hybrid and information wars, the permanent terrorist threat, and armed conflicts. This research aims on highlighting the freedom of speech realization problem in current information and hybrid wars, as well as on revealing the features of the relationship between freedom of speech and security measures in democratic states. Nowadays, informational confrontation, information attacks and wars have become the dominant component in the struggle for global leadership. World democracies face the problem of comprehensive freedom of speech implementation on the one hand, and on the other hand - maintaining the safe state existence in conditions of hybrid wars, negative informational effects on public consciousness and spiritual-cultural area of the country. In different countries of the world, the beginning of the XXI century events have clearly shown that by means of social networks, it is possible to carry out information attacks against entire nations in order to destabilize the situation, create an auspicious spiritual and psychological climate for the further manipulative actions, destructive influence on existing political and economic systems, legal, spiritual, cultural and other relations, which ultimately leads to the destabilizing of state, information, political and economic sovereignty of the country. To date, in scientific and expert circles, the main criteria have been developed, whereby it is determined whether a country has become the object of information war and information expansion, which accordingly requires the state to take countermeasures to strengthen national security (informational in particular), freedom of speech regulation. Thus, in all of its aspects, the freedom of speech must be ensured by a democratic state, but at the same time it is necessary to clearly define the boundaries of openness in certain areas (military, national security) for the stable country existence.

Highlights

  • Філософія активно використовуються як інструмент у «гібридних» та інформаційних війнах, як зброя, спрямована на руйнування духовно-ціннісних підвалин сус­ пільної свідомості

  • Однак таке поширення не повинно призводити до втручання держави в медійний контент або до обмеження свободи вираження поглядів [7, с. 8-9]

  • In all o f its aspects, thefreedom o f speech must be ensured by a democratic state, but a t the same time it is necessary to clearly define the boundaries o f openness in certain areas (military, national security) fo r the stable country existence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Філософія активно використовуються як інструмент у «гібридних» та інформаційних війнах, як зброя, спрямована на руйнування духовно-ціннісних підвалин сус­ пільної свідомості. Приступенко зосередили увагу на проб­ лемах забезпечення свободи слова в Україні та розкритті форм прихованої цензури щодо діяльності засобів масової інформації. Перед демократіями світу постала проблема, з одного боку, всебічної реалізації свободи слова, а з іншого - підтримання безпечного іс­ нування держави в умовах «гібридних» війн, негативних інформаційних впливів на суспільну свідомість і духовно-культурний простір країни.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call