Abstract
This article discusses the use of the traditional warranty given by recording artists and music composers, when signing contracts with record and music publishing companies, that the material they submit shall not be blasphemous. The historical context and evolving legal nature of blasphemy in England is analysed in the light of article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, namely freedom of expression, which has been introduced into English law by the Human Rights Act 1998. The article argues that record and music publishing companies have – albeit by accident rather than design – realigned their respective contracts so that they are more in tune with the spirit of the Convention in terms of freedom of expression by removing the warranty in respect of blasphemy. However, blasphemy is still a crime in England, so music law practitioners representing parties to the record and music publishing contracts need to be aware that this remains the case and advise their clients accordingly.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
