Abstract

The form in which a micronutrient is found in the rhizosphere affects its availability to plants. We compared the availability to barley of the free hydrated cation form of Fe3+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+ versus their total metal concentrations (free ion plus complexes) in chelator-buffered solutions. Free metal ion activities were estimated using the chemical equilibrium program GEOCHEM-PC with the corrected database. In experiment 1, barley was grown in nutrient solutions with different Fe3+ activities using chelators to control Fe levels. Chlorosis occurred at Fe3+ activities of 10−18 and 10−19M for barley grown in HEDTA and EDTA solutions, respectively. In experiment 2, barley was grown in nutrient solutions with the same calculated Fe3+ activity and the same chelator, but different total Fe concentrations. Leaf, root and shoot Fe concentrations were higher from CDTA buffered solutions which had the higher total Fe concentration indicating the importance of the total Fe concentration on Fe uptake. Results from treatments using EDTA or HEDTA, with one exception, were similar to the results from the CDTA treatment. This suggests differences in critical Fe3+ activities found in experiment 1 were due to differences in the total Fe concentration and not errors in chelate formation constants used to estimate the critical activities. Results for Cu, Zn, and Mn were similar to Fe; despite solutions with equal free Cu2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ activities, plant concentrations of these metals were generally greater when grown in the solutions with the greater total amount of Cu, Zn, or Mn. When the free Zn2+ activity was kept constant while the total amount of Zn was increased from 4.4 to 49 μM, leaf Zn concentration increased from 77 to 146 μg g-1. In order to predict metal availability to barley and other species in chelator-buffered nutrient solutions, both free and total metal concentrations in solution must be considered. The critical Fe3+ activities required by barley in this study are much higher than those from tomato and soybean, 10-28M, which strongly supports the Strategy 2 model of Fe uptake for Poaceae. This is related to the importance of the Fe3+ (barley) and the Fe2+ (tomato and soybean) ions in Fe uptake. Fe-stressed barley is known to release phytosiderophores which compete for Fe3+ in the nutrient solution, while tomato and soybean reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ at the epidermal cell membranes to allow uptake of Fe2+ from Fe3+ chelates in solution.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call