Abstract
Activities performed by wildland firefighters are carried out wearing a personal protective equipment (PPE). Although the PPE protects workers from a wide variety of hazards, it may increase their physiological response and limit their performance. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the protective clothing (PPC) and the rest of the PPE elements (i.e., helmet, neck shroud, gloves, goggles, and mid-calf leather boots) on the wildland firefighters’ thermophysiological response during a moderate-intense exercise. Six male wildland firefighters performed, in a counterbalanced order, a 120 min graded exercise test wearing three different clothing configurations: (i) a traditional short sports gear (SG), (ii) a PPC, and (iii) a complete firefighters’ PPE. Trials were conducted on separate days at the same time of the day (12:00–15:00 h) and under climate-controlled conditions (∼30°C and ∼30% relative humidity). Heart rate, respiratory gas exchange, gastrointestinal and skin temperature, blood lactate concentration were recorded throughout the tests. Additionally, parameters of heat balance were estimated. Exercise time was shorter (p < 0.001) wearing the PPE (62.4 ± 13.3 min) than with the PPC (115.5 ± 5.0 min) and SG (118.2 ± 20.7 min). The increment of gastrointestinal temperature with the PPE (1.8 ± 0.3°C) was greater (p < 0.05) than the observed in PPC (1.2 ± 0.6°C) and SG (1.0 ± 0.2°C). The use of PPC increased (p < 0.05) subjects’ metabolic demand and skin temperature versus SG during the last 20 min of the test. The sweat retention in the PPE (1,045.7 ± 214.7 g) and PPC (978.3 ± 330.6 g) was significantly higher than that obtained in the SG (510.0 ± 210.0 g). Sweat efficiency decreased (p < 0.05) in the following order: PPE (45.6 ± 18.3%), PPC (64.3 ± 7.8%), and SG (79.3 ± 7.0%). These results highlight the importance of the PPE elements in the subjects’ thermal strain. The reduction in the sweat evaporation produced by the PPE, together with the ensemble mass caused a substantial increase in the subjects’ thermophysiological response. As a consequence the performance was reduced by ∼50%.
Highlights
Wildfire firefighting is a demanding occupation (Rodríguez-Marroyo et al, 2012), which may require an average work energy expenditure of 2,400–3,000 kcal day−1, reaching even 12 kcal min−1 in specific moments (Cuddy et al, 2015)
Wearing the protective equipment (PPE) resulted in a higher Tgi (p < 0.05, η2p = 0.31– 0.77), Tskin (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.74–0.87), and physiological strain index (PSI) (p < 0.05; η2p = 0.16–0.87) throughout the test versus those analyzed with the sports gear (SG)
The main finding of this study was that the use of PPE in moderate-high efforts leads to a significant increase in the wildland firefighters’ physiological strain
Summary
Wildfire firefighting is a demanding occupation (Rodríguez-Marroyo et al, 2012), which may require an average work energy expenditure of 2,400–3,000 kcal day−1, reaching even 12 kcal min−1 in specific moments (Cuddy et al, 2015). Protective Clothing Effects on Physiological Response (Adetona et al, 2016) and be exposed to both solar and flame radiation (Keiser and Rossi, 2008; Rodríguez-Marroyo et al, 2012), which increase their heat stress (GonzálezAlonso et al, 1999; Cheuvront et al, 2010) Under these circumstances, the use of personal protective clothing (PPC) may exacerbate the wildland firefighters’ thermal strain (Carballo-Leyenda et al, 2017) and limit their performance. It has been observed this item may have a greater impact than that observed wearing the PPC (Taylor et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2014)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call